VulnerabilityPublished 15 Jul 2025Updated 26 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-50062: Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core · Improper Privilege Management

Affects Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll CoreSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.1 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 23% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Oracle Corporation PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core	Affected =9.2.51 =9.2.52	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting network access to PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core interfaces, especially limiting HTTP access to trusted internal networks or VPNs. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to reduce exposure of PeopleSoft servers to untrusted networks. 3. Enforce the principle of least privilege by auditing and minimizing user privileges within PeopleSoft, ensuring no unnecessary low-privileged accounts have network access. 4. Monitor logs and alerts for unusual activity related to payroll data access or modification. 5. Apply any available vendor patches or security updates as soon as Oracle releases them. 6. If patches are not yet available, consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting the Global Payroll Core component. 7. Conduct thorough access reviews and implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all PeopleSoft user accounts to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 8. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing potential payroll data breaches. 9. Engage with Oracle support for guidance and early access to patches or workarounds. 10. Regularly update and test backups of payroll data to enable recovery in case of data tampering or deletion.

Description

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Global Payroll for Core). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.51 and 9.2.52. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise HCM Global Payroll Core accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Impact

The potential impact of CVE-2025-50062 is severe for organizations using affected PeopleSoft versions. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability can gain unauthorized access to sensitive payroll data, including employee compensation, tax information, and other critical HR data. This can lead to data breaches, fraud, financial loss, and regulatory non-compliance. Unauthorized modification or deletion of payroll data can disrupt payroll processing, causing operational and reputational damage. Since payroll data is often tightly integrated with financial and HR systems, compromise can cascade into broader enterprise risks. The vulnerability's remote exploitability and low privilege requirement increase the likelihood of exploitation, especially in environments where network access controls are weak. Organizations with large employee bases or those in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, government) face heightened risks. Additionally, insider threats or compromised low-privilege accounts could be leveraged to exploit this flaw, amplifying its impact.

CWE-269Improper Privilege Management (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Restful Privilege Elevation (opens in a new tab)
Privilege Abuse (opens in a new tab)
Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2025.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Feb 2026, 03:08 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-269

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats