CVE-2025-50735VulnerabilityPublished 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-50735: NextChat · n/a

Affects NextChatSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 2.16.1 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 59% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.16.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade chatgptnextweb/NextChat to 2.16.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubchatgptnextweb/NextChat`pkg:github/chatgptnextweb/NextChat`Other threats	Affected <2.16.1	Fixed in 2.16.1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately audit and restrict access to WebDAV endpoints in NextChat environments, limiting exposure to trusted networks and authenticated users only. 2. Implement strict input validation and canonicalization on all WebDAV requests to prevent traversal sequences such as '../'. 3. Disable WebDAV proxy functionality if not required or replace it with more secure file access methods. 4. Monitor logs for unusual WebDAV activity, especially requests containing dot path segments or attempts to access sensitive directories. 5. Apply network segmentation to isolate NextChat servers and reduce exposure to external threats. 6. Stay alert for official patches or updates from NextChat vendors and apply them promptly once available. 7. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on WebDAV and directory traversal vulnerabilities. 8. Educate system administrators on the risks associated with WebDAV and directory traversal to ensure proper configuration and monitoring.

Description

Directory traversal vulnerability in NextChat thru 2.16.0 due to the WebDAV proxy failing to canonicalize or reject dot path segments in its catch-all route, allowing attackers to gain sensitive information via authenticated or anonymous WebDAV endpoints.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-50735 is the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information due to directory traversal via WebDAV endpoints. This could include access to private communications, configuration files, or other critical data stored within NextChat environments. Such exposure can lead to data breaches, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR violations), and reputational damage. The vulnerability may also facilitate further attacks if attackers obtain credentials or system details from exposed files. Organizations relying on NextChat for internal or external communications, especially in sectors like finance, healthcare, or government, face elevated risks. The ease of exploitation without user interaction or complex prerequisites increases the threat level. Additionally, if WebDAV endpoints are exposed to the internet or poorly segmented internally, the attack surface broadens significantly. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive defense, but this may change rapidly once the vulnerability becomes widely known.

CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #6OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
Implementation · Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Path Traversal (opens in a new tab)
Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic (opens in a new tab)
Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls (opens in a new tab)
Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 20:18 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-22

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats