CVE-2025-5112: Buffer Overflow in FreeFloat FTP Server
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the component MGET Command Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-5112 is a buffer overflow vulnerability identified in FreeFloat FTP Server version 1.0, specifically within the MGET command handler component. The vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely send specially crafted MGET commands that overflow a buffer, potentially leading to memory corruption. This can result in arbitrary code execution or denial of service conditions on the affected server. The vulnerability is exploitable without any authentication or user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9, categorized as medium severity, reflecting that while the attack is remotely executable and requires no privileges, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited to low levels. The vulnerability has been publicly disclosed, but there are no known exploits currently observed in the wild. The lack of available patches or mitigations from the vendor increases the risk for organizations still running this version of FreeFloat FTP Server. Given the nature of FTP servers as network-facing services, this vulnerability could be leveraged by attackers to gain unauthorized access or disrupt file transfer services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the deployment of FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0 within their infrastructure. Organizations using this outdated FTP server version may face risks including unauthorized remote code execution, which could lead to data breaches, service disruption, or lateral movement within internal networks. Confidentiality could be compromised if attackers gain control over the server, potentially exposing sensitive files. Integrity and availability of file transfer services could also be affected, disrupting business operations. Since FTP servers often handle critical file exchanges, especially in sectors like manufacturing, finance, and government, exploitation could have operational and reputational consequences. The medium CVSS score suggests that while exploitation is feasible, the overall impact might be contained if compensating controls are in place. However, the absence of patches and public exploit code means organizations must proactively assess and mitigate exposure to prevent future attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate identification and inventory of all FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0 instances within the network to assess exposure. 2. If possible, upgrade to a newer, patched version of the FTP server or migrate to a more secure and actively maintained FTP solution. 3. Implement network-level controls such as firewall rules to restrict access to FTP servers only to trusted IP addresses or internal networks. 4. Employ intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection tuned to detect suspicious FTP MGET command patterns. 5. Monitor logs for unusual FTP activity, especially anomalous MGET commands or connection attempts from unknown sources. 6. If patching or upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider disabling the MGET command functionality if configurable, or temporarily disabling the FTP service until a secure solution is implemented. 7. Conduct regular vulnerability scans and penetration tests focusing on FTP services to detect exploitation attempts. 8. Educate IT staff about this vulnerability and ensure incident response plans include steps for FTP server compromise scenarios.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium
CVE-2025-5112: Buffer Overflow in FreeFloat FTP Server
Description
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the component MGET Command Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-5112 is a buffer overflow vulnerability identified in FreeFloat FTP Server version 1.0, specifically within the MGET command handler component. The vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely send specially crafted MGET commands that overflow a buffer, potentially leading to memory corruption. This can result in arbitrary code execution or denial of service conditions on the affected server. The vulnerability is exploitable without any authentication or user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9, categorized as medium severity, reflecting that while the attack is remotely executable and requires no privileges, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited to low levels. The vulnerability has been publicly disclosed, but there are no known exploits currently observed in the wild. The lack of available patches or mitigations from the vendor increases the risk for organizations still running this version of FreeFloat FTP Server. Given the nature of FTP servers as network-facing services, this vulnerability could be leveraged by attackers to gain unauthorized access or disrupt file transfer services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the deployment of FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0 within their infrastructure. Organizations using this outdated FTP server version may face risks including unauthorized remote code execution, which could lead to data breaches, service disruption, or lateral movement within internal networks. Confidentiality could be compromised if attackers gain control over the server, potentially exposing sensitive files. Integrity and availability of file transfer services could also be affected, disrupting business operations. Since FTP servers often handle critical file exchanges, especially in sectors like manufacturing, finance, and government, exploitation could have operational and reputational consequences. The medium CVSS score suggests that while exploitation is feasible, the overall impact might be contained if compensating controls are in place. However, the absence of patches and public exploit code means organizations must proactively assess and mitigate exposure to prevent future attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate identification and inventory of all FreeFloat FTP Server 1.0 instances within the network to assess exposure. 2. If possible, upgrade to a newer, patched version of the FTP server or migrate to a more secure and actively maintained FTP solution. 3. Implement network-level controls such as firewall rules to restrict access to FTP servers only to trusted IP addresses or internal networks. 4. Employ intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection tuned to detect suspicious FTP MGET command patterns. 5. Monitor logs for unusual FTP activity, especially anomalous MGET commands or connection attempts from unknown sources. 6. If patching or upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider disabling the MGET command functionality if configurable, or temporarily disabling the FTP service until a secure solution is implemented. 7. Conduct regular vulnerability scans and penetration tests focusing on FTP services to detect exploitation attempts. 8. Educate IT staff about this vulnerability and ensure incident response plans include steps for FTP server compromise scenarios.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- VulDB
- Date Reserved
- 2025-05-23T06:31:34.166Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6830811c0acd01a2492738de
Added to database: 5/23/2025, 2:07:24 PM
Last enriched: 7/8/2025, 11:25:37 PM
Last updated: 1/7/2026, 10:25:28 AM
Views: 45
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-68637: CWE-297 Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch in Apache Software Foundation Apache Uniffle
UnknownCVE-2025-15158: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in eastsidecode WP Enable WebP
HighCVE-2025-15018: CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in djanym Optional Email
CriticalCVE-2025-15000: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in tfrommen Page Keys
MediumCVE-2025-14999: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in kentothemes Latest Tabs
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.