VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-53077: Samsung Electronics DMS(Data Management Server) · Execution After Redirect (EAR)

Affects Samsung Electronics DMS(Data Management Server)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 27% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Samsung Electronics DMS(Data Management Server)	Affected =2.0.0 =2.5.0.17 =2.7.0.15	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the Samsung DMS interface to trusted internal networks and implementing strict firewall rules to limit exposure.
Monitor logs and system behavior for unusual redirect patterns or unauthorized function executions indicative of exploitation attempts.
Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious redirect sequences targeting the DMS.
Coordinate with Samsung Electronics for timely release and deployment of official patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-53077.
Conduct thorough security assessments and penetration testing focused on redirect handling and permission enforcement within the DMS environment.
Implement strict role-based access controls (RBAC) and audit trails to quickly identify and respond to unauthorized activities.
Educate IT and security teams about this specific vulnerability to enhance detection and response capabilities. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on network segmentation, active monitoring for redirect abuse, and leveraging vendor collaboration for patch management.

Description

An execution after redirect in Samsung DMS(Data Management Server) allows attackers to execute limited functions without permissions. An attacker could compromise the integrity of the platform by executing this vulnerability.

Impact

For European organizations using Samsung DMS, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity and availability of their data management infrastructure. Unauthorized execution of functions could lead to data corruption, unauthorized configuration changes, or service disruptions. Given that DMS often plays a central role in managing and orchestrating data flows, any compromise could cascade into broader operational impacts, affecting business continuity and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not trivially exploitable for full system takeover, it still represents a significant risk, especially in environments where DMS is integrated with critical business processes or sensitive data repositories. European organizations in sectors such as manufacturing, telecommunications, and enterprise IT services that rely on Samsung DMS may face increased operational risk and potential regulatory scrutiny if this vulnerability is exploited.

References

security.samsungda.com/securityUpdates.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 29 Jul 2025, 05:33 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-698

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats