CVE-2025-53177VulnerabilityPublished 7 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-53177: Huawei HarmonyOS · Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls

Affects Huawei HarmonyOSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.9 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

3.9Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.09% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Huawei HarmonyOS	Affected =4.3.0 =4.2.0 =4.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations using Huawei HarmonyOS devices should: 1) Monitor for and apply any official patches or updates from Huawei promptly once available. 2) Restrict local access to devices by enforcing strong physical security controls and limiting user privileges to the minimum necessary. 3) Educate users about the risks of interacting with untrusted applications or links that could trigger the vulnerability. 4) Implement device management policies that control app permissions and monitor calendar-related activities for anomalies. 5) Where possible, isolate critical devices or use alternative scheduling solutions that do not rely solely on the vulnerable calendar module. 6) Conduct regular audits of device configurations and user permissions to ensure compliance with security best practices. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on controlling local access, user interaction risks, and operational dependencies on the calendar syncing function.

Description

Permission bypass vulnerability in the calendar storage module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect the schedule syncing function of watches.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-53177 is relatively limited due to its low severity and local attack vector. However, organizations that deploy Huawei HarmonyOS devices, especially in environments where schedule synchronization between devices (such as smartphones and smartwatches) is critical for operational efficiency, could experience disruptions. This could affect sectors like healthcare, logistics, or corporate environments where timely notifications and calendar events are essential. The integrity and availability of calendar data could be compromised, leading to missed appointments or misaligned schedules. While the vulnerability does not expose sensitive data directly, the disruption of calendar syncing could indirectly affect productivity and coordination. Given the requirement for local access and user interaction, the threat is less likely to be exploited remotely or at scale, reducing the overall risk to large enterprises but still warranting attention in sensitive or high-dependency use cases.

CWE-264Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls (opens in a new tab)
CategoryOWASP Top 10 A01:2021: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Weaknesses in this category are related to the management of permissions, privileges, and other security features that are used to perform access control.
MITRE does not allow mapping vulnerabilities to this entry; it groups weaknesses rather than naming one.

References

consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/7/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jul 2025, 02:56 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-264

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats