CVE-2025-53513: CWE-24: Path Traversal: '../filedir' in Canonical Juju
The /charms endpoint on a Juju controller lacked sufficient authorization checks, allowing any user with an account on the controller to upload a charm. Uploading a malicious charm that exploits a Zip Slip vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain access to a machine running a unit through the affected charm.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-53513 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting Canonical's Juju software versions 2.0.0 and 3.0.0. Juju is a popular open-source application modeling tool used to deploy, configure, and manage services in cloud environments. The vulnerability arises from insufficient authorization checks on the /charms endpoint of the Juju controller. Specifically, any authenticated user with an account on the controller can upload a charm without proper validation. This flaw enables attackers to upload malicious charms that exploit a Zip Slip vulnerability, a type of path traversal attack (CWE-24). Zip Slip allows crafted archive files to overwrite arbitrary files on the filesystem by using directory traversal sequences like '../' in filenames within the archive. By leveraging this, an attacker can place malicious files outside the intended directory, potentially gaining unauthorized access or control over machines running Juju units. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring privileges (PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N), with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Although no known exploits are reported in the wild yet, the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the ease of exploitation by any authenticated user and the critical impact on affected systems. The lack of patch links suggests that remediation may still be pending or in progress. Organizations using Juju for cloud orchestration must urgently assess exposure and apply mitigations to prevent potential compromise through malicious charm uploads.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-53513 can be severe, especially for those relying on Juju to manage cloud infrastructure and services. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, data breaches, service disruption, and lateral movement within the network. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive configuration files or credentials. Integrity is compromised by the ability to overwrite or inject malicious files, potentially altering service behavior or injecting backdoors. Availability could be affected if critical services are disrupted or machines are taken offline. Given Juju's role in orchestrating complex cloud environments, exploitation could cascade, affecting multiple services and business-critical applications. This threat is particularly relevant for sectors with stringent data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government institutions in Europe. Additionally, the ability for any authenticated user to exploit this vulnerability raises insider threat concerns, increasing the risk from compromised or malicious internal accounts. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive defense, but the high CVSS score underscores the urgency of mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate Restriction of Access: Limit Juju controller account creation and access strictly to trusted administrators and users with a clear operational need. 2. Implement Strong Authentication and Monitoring: Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all Juju accounts and monitor charm upload activities for anomalies or unauthorized attempts. 3. Apply Principle of Least Privilege: Review and reduce user privileges on the Juju controller to minimize the number of accounts capable of uploading charms. 4. Validate and Sanitize Uploaded Charms: Until an official patch is available, implement manual or automated scanning of uploaded charms to detect path traversal patterns or suspicious archive contents. 5. Network Segmentation: Isolate Juju controllers and units in secure network zones to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 6. Patch Management: Monitor Canonical’s advisories closely and apply official patches or updates as soon as they are released. 7. Incident Response Preparedness: Prepare to respond to potential exploitation by having backups, forensic capabilities, and remediation plans ready. 8. Engage with Canonical Support: Seek guidance and potential workarounds from Canonical to mitigate risk in the interim. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on access control tightening, proactive detection, and environment hardening tailored to Juju’s operational context.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Ireland
CVE-2025-53513: CWE-24: Path Traversal: '../filedir' in Canonical Juju
Description
The /charms endpoint on a Juju controller lacked sufficient authorization checks, allowing any user with an account on the controller to upload a charm. Uploading a malicious charm that exploits a Zip Slip vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain access to a machine running a unit through the affected charm.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-53513 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting Canonical's Juju software versions 2.0.0 and 3.0.0. Juju is a popular open-source application modeling tool used to deploy, configure, and manage services in cloud environments. The vulnerability arises from insufficient authorization checks on the /charms endpoint of the Juju controller. Specifically, any authenticated user with an account on the controller can upload a charm without proper validation. This flaw enables attackers to upload malicious charms that exploit a Zip Slip vulnerability, a type of path traversal attack (CWE-24). Zip Slip allows crafted archive files to overwrite arbitrary files on the filesystem by using directory traversal sequences like '../' in filenames within the archive. By leveraging this, an attacker can place malicious files outside the intended directory, potentially gaining unauthorized access or control over machines running Juju units. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring privileges (PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N), with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Although no known exploits are reported in the wild yet, the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the ease of exploitation by any authenticated user and the critical impact on affected systems. The lack of patch links suggests that remediation may still be pending or in progress. Organizations using Juju for cloud orchestration must urgently assess exposure and apply mitigations to prevent potential compromise through malicious charm uploads.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-53513 can be severe, especially for those relying on Juju to manage cloud infrastructure and services. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, data breaches, service disruption, and lateral movement within the network. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive configuration files or credentials. Integrity is compromised by the ability to overwrite or inject malicious files, potentially altering service behavior or injecting backdoors. Availability could be affected if critical services are disrupted or machines are taken offline. Given Juju's role in orchestrating complex cloud environments, exploitation could cascade, affecting multiple services and business-critical applications. This threat is particularly relevant for sectors with stringent data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government institutions in Europe. Additionally, the ability for any authenticated user to exploit this vulnerability raises insider threat concerns, increasing the risk from compromised or malicious internal accounts. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive defense, but the high CVSS score underscores the urgency of mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate Restriction of Access: Limit Juju controller account creation and access strictly to trusted administrators and users with a clear operational need. 2. Implement Strong Authentication and Monitoring: Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all Juju accounts and monitor charm upload activities for anomalies or unauthorized attempts. 3. Apply Principle of Least Privilege: Review and reduce user privileges on the Juju controller to minimize the number of accounts capable of uploading charms. 4. Validate and Sanitize Uploaded Charms: Until an official patch is available, implement manual or automated scanning of uploaded charms to detect path traversal patterns or suspicious archive contents. 5. Network Segmentation: Isolate Juju controllers and units in secure network zones to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 6. Patch Management: Monitor Canonical’s advisories closely and apply official patches or updates as soon as they are released. 7. Incident Response Preparedness: Prepare to respond to potential exploitation by having backups, forensic capabilities, and remediation plans ready. 8. Engage with Canonical Support: Seek guidance and potential workarounds from Canonical to mitigate risk in the interim. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on access control tightening, proactive detection, and environment hardening tailored to Juju’s operational context.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- canonical
- Date Reserved
- 2025-07-02T08:52:42.037Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 686d50d86f40f0eb72f91cdb
Added to database: 7/8/2025, 5:09:44 PM
Last enriched: 7/15/2025, 9:53:10 PM
Last updated: 8/21/2025, 5:32:43 PM
Views: 24
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9341: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS
MediumCVE-2025-8678: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in johnbillion WP Crontrol
MediumCVE-2025-57699: Unquoted search path or element in Western Digital Corporation Western Digital Kitfox for Windows
MediumCVE-2025-8281: CWE-79 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in WP Talroo
HighCVE-2025-41452: CWE-15: External Control of System or Configuration Setting in Danfoss AK-SM8xxA Series
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.