CVE-2025-5365VulnerabilityPublished 31 May 2025Updated 2 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-5365: Campcodes Online Hospital Management System · SQL Injection

Affects Campcodes Online Hospital Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 41% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 31 May 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Online Hospital Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate network-level protections: Restrict access to the /admin/patient-search.php endpoint using firewalls or web application firewalls (WAFs) to allow only trusted IP addresses, ideally internal networks or VPNs. 2. Input validation and sanitization: Implement strict input validation on the 'searchdata' parameter to reject or sanitize malicious input, using parameterized queries or prepared statements if possible. 3. Application-layer WAF rules: Deploy WAF rules specifically targeting SQL injection patterns on the vulnerable parameter. 4. Network segmentation: Isolate the hospital management system from public networks and limit exposure to reduce attack surface. 5. Monitoring and logging: Enable detailed logging of access to the vulnerable endpoint and monitor for unusual query patterns or spikes in failed searches indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Vendor engagement: Engage with Campcodes for patches or official guidance and plan for timely updates once available. 7. Incident response readiness: Prepare to respond to potential data breaches or system compromises, including data backup and recovery plans. 8. Consider temporary disabling or restricting the patient search functionality if feasible until a patch is available.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Campcodes Online Hospital Management System 1.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/patient-search.php. The manipulation of the argument searchdata leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly healthcare providers using Campcodes Online Hospital Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to patient data confidentiality and system integrity. Exploitation could result in unauthorized disclosure of sensitive health information, violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, leading to legal penalties and reputational damage. Additionally, manipulation of patient records could disrupt clinical workflows, potentially endangering patient safety. The healthcare sector is a high-value target in Europe, often targeted by cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors. The ability to exploit this vulnerability remotely without authentication increases the likelihood of attacks, especially in environments where the system is exposed to the internet or insufficiently segmented networks. The absence of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls to mitigate risk. The impact extends beyond data breaches to operational disruption, undermining trust in healthcare IT systems.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 12:57 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats