CVE-2025-5493VulnerabilityPublished 3 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-5493: Baison Channel Middleware Product · SQL Injection

Affects Baison Channel Middleware ProductSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 40% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Baison Channel Middleware Product	Affected =2.0.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the vulnerable middleware endpoints, ideally limiting exposure to trusted internal networks or VPNs. 2. Implement Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the /e3api/api/main/ToJsonByControlName endpoint. 3. Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all parameters, especially the 'data' argument, to prevent injection of malicious SQL code. 4. Monitor logs for unusual database queries or errors indicative of injection attempts. 5. Engage with Baison for official patches or updates; if unavailable, consider temporary workarounds such as disabling the vulnerable API functionality if feasible. 6. Perform security assessments and penetration testing focused on middleware components to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities. 7. Educate development and operations teams about secure coding practices and the importance of parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. 8. Maintain an incident response plan to quickly address any exploitation attempts, including isolating affected systems and forensic analysis.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Baison Channel Middleware Product 2.0.1 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /e3api/api/main/ToJsonByControlName. The manipulation of the argument data leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using Baison Channel Middleware Product 2.0.1, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Middleware often handles critical data flows between front-end applications and backend databases; thus, exploitation could lead to unauthorized data access or modification, impacting business operations and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The partial impact on confidentiality and integrity could result in exposure of sensitive customer or operational data, leading to reputational damage and regulatory penalties. Availability impact, though limited, could disrupt services relying on the middleware, affecting business continuity. Since the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without user interaction, attackers could target exposed middleware endpoints over the internet or internal networks. European organizations with complex IT environments integrating Baison middleware should be particularly cautious, as attackers might leverage this vulnerability to pivot within networks. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate threat levels, but public disclosure increases the risk of future exploitation attempts.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…