CVE-2025-55109: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation in BMC Control-M/Agent
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions when using an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore. A remote attacker with access to a signed third-party or demo certificate for client authentication can bypass the need for a certificate signed by the certificate authority of the organization during authentication on the Control-M/Agent. The Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded certificates which are only trusted as fallback if an empty kdb keystore is used; they are never trusted if a PKCS#12 keystore is used. All of these certificates are now expired. In addition, the Control-M/Agent default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores contain trusted third-party certificates (external recognized CAs and default self-signed demo certificates) which are trusted for client authentication.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-55109 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability affecting BMC Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 through 9.0.20, and potentially earlier unsupported versions. The vulnerability arises due to improper certificate validation (CWE-295) when the product uses an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore for client authentication. Specifically, the Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded fallback certificates that are trusted only if an empty kdb keystore is used; however, these certificates are expired. More critically, the default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores include trusted third-party certificates from external recognized certificate authorities and default self-signed demo certificates. This configuration allows a remote attacker who possesses a signed third-party or demo certificate to bypass the requirement for a certificate signed by the organization's certificate authority during authentication. The attacker can thus authenticate to the Control-M/Agent without proper authorization, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the system. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without user interaction or prior authentication, but requires the attacker to have access to a valid third-party or demo certificate. The CVSS v4.0 score is 9.5 (critical), reflecting the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with the ease of remote exploitation under certain conditions. No patches are currently linked, and no known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date (September 16, 2025).
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is significant, especially for those relying on BMC Control-M/Agent for workload automation and job scheduling in critical IT environments. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to bypass authentication controls, leading to unauthorized execution of jobs, manipulation of workflows, data exfiltration, or disruption of business-critical processes. This could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and affect the availability of essential IT services. Given the widespread use of Control-M in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, telecommunications, and government agencies across Europe, exploitation could result in operational downtime, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR breaches), financial losses, and reputational damage. The lack of patches and the presence of expired or default certificates exacerbate the risk, especially in organizations that have not upgraded or hardened their Control-M/Agent deployments. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as a foothold for lateral movement within networks, increasing the scope of potential damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take immediate and specific actions beyond generic advice: 1) Identify all instances of BMC Control-M/Agent in their environment, focusing on versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and earlier unsupported versions. 2) Replace default or empty kdb and PKCS#12 keystores with properly configured keystores containing only organization-approved certificates signed by trusted internal certificate authorities. 3) Remove or disable any hardcoded or fallback certificates, especially expired ones, to prevent fallback trust scenarios. 4) Implement strict certificate validation policies and verify that client authentication requires certificates issued by the organization's CA. 5) Monitor authentication logs for unusual certificate usage or authentication attempts using third-party or demo certificates. 6) If possible, upgrade to a supported version of Control-M/Agent where this vulnerability is addressed or mitigated. 7) Employ network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of Control-M/Agent interfaces to trusted networks and users only. 8) Prepare incident response plans specific to Control-M/Agent compromise scenarios. 9) Engage with BMC support or security advisories for any forthcoming patches or mitigations. These steps will help reduce the attack surface and prevent exploitation of the improper certificate validation vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Belgium
CVE-2025-55109: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation in BMC Control-M/Agent
Description
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions when using an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore. A remote attacker with access to a signed third-party or demo certificate for client authentication can bypass the need for a certificate signed by the certificate authority of the organization during authentication on the Control-M/Agent. The Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded certificates which are only trusted as fallback if an empty kdb keystore is used; they are never trusted if a PKCS#12 keystore is used. All of these certificates are now expired. In addition, the Control-M/Agent default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores contain trusted third-party certificates (external recognized CAs and default self-signed demo certificates) which are trusted for client authentication.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-55109 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability affecting BMC Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 through 9.0.20, and potentially earlier unsupported versions. The vulnerability arises due to improper certificate validation (CWE-295) when the product uses an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore for client authentication. Specifically, the Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded fallback certificates that are trusted only if an empty kdb keystore is used; however, these certificates are expired. More critically, the default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores include trusted third-party certificates from external recognized certificate authorities and default self-signed demo certificates. This configuration allows a remote attacker who possesses a signed third-party or demo certificate to bypass the requirement for a certificate signed by the organization's certificate authority during authentication. The attacker can thus authenticate to the Control-M/Agent without proper authorization, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the system. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without user interaction or prior authentication, but requires the attacker to have access to a valid third-party or demo certificate. The CVSS v4.0 score is 9.5 (critical), reflecting the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with the ease of remote exploitation under certain conditions. No patches are currently linked, and no known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date (September 16, 2025).
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is significant, especially for those relying on BMC Control-M/Agent for workload automation and job scheduling in critical IT environments. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to bypass authentication controls, leading to unauthorized execution of jobs, manipulation of workflows, data exfiltration, or disruption of business-critical processes. This could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and affect the availability of essential IT services. Given the widespread use of Control-M in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, telecommunications, and government agencies across Europe, exploitation could result in operational downtime, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR breaches), financial losses, and reputational damage. The lack of patches and the presence of expired or default certificates exacerbate the risk, especially in organizations that have not upgraded or hardened their Control-M/Agent deployments. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged as a foothold for lateral movement within networks, increasing the scope of potential damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take immediate and specific actions beyond generic advice: 1) Identify all instances of BMC Control-M/Agent in their environment, focusing on versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and earlier unsupported versions. 2) Replace default or empty kdb and PKCS#12 keystores with properly configured keystores containing only organization-approved certificates signed by trusted internal certificate authorities. 3) Remove or disable any hardcoded or fallback certificates, especially expired ones, to prevent fallback trust scenarios. 4) Implement strict certificate validation policies and verify that client authentication requires certificates issued by the organization's CA. 5) Monitor authentication logs for unusual certificate usage or authentication attempts using third-party or demo certificates. 6) If possible, upgrade to a supported version of Control-M/Agent where this vulnerability is addressed or mitigated. 7) Employ network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of Control-M/Agent interfaces to trusted networks and users only. 8) Prepare incident response plans specific to Control-M/Agent compromise scenarios. 9) Engage with BMC support or security advisories for any forthcoming patches or mitigations. These steps will help reduce the attack surface and prevent exploitation of the improper certificate validation vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- airbus
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-07T07:23:59.125Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68c9aeedde7b17539b24308a
Added to database: 9/16/2025, 6:39:41 PM
Last enriched: 9/24/2025, 1:19:25 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 1:16:03 AM
Views: 162
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2071: Buffer Overflow in UTT 进取 520W
HighCVE-2026-25762: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25754: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25644: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in datahub-project datahub
HighCVE-2026-25804: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in antrea-io antrea
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.