CVE-2025-55319: Remote Code Execution in Microsoft Visual Studio Code
Ai command injection in Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-55319 is a high-severity remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting Microsoft Visual Studio Code version 1.0.0. The vulnerability arises from an AI command injection flaw in the integration between Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code. Specifically, an unauthorized attacker can exploit this flaw over a network to execute arbitrary code on the target system without requiring any privileges. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-77, which relates to improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection'). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.8, reflecting its critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requires user interaction (UI:R). The scope is unchanged (S:U), and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high (C:H/I:H/A:H). The exploitability level is official (RL:O) and confirmed (RC:C). Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data theft, or disruption of development environments. The lack of available patches at the time of publication increases the urgency for mitigation. This vulnerability is particularly concerning because Visual Studio Code is widely used by developers globally, and the integration with AI command features introduces a novel attack surface that can be leveraged remotely. Attackers could craft malicious inputs or commands that the AI component processes, triggering command injection and code execution on the victim's machine.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for software development firms, IT service providers, and enterprises relying heavily on Visual Studio Code for their development workflows. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive source code, intellectual property theft, insertion of malicious code into software projects, and disruption of development pipelines. This could have downstream effects on software supply chains, potentially affecting customers and partners. Additionally, compromised developer machines could serve as footholds for lateral movement within corporate networks, increasing the risk of broader breaches. Given the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, organizations could face operational downtime, reputational damage, and regulatory consequences under GDPR if personal data is exposed or manipulated. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering could be used to trick developers into triggering the exploit, emphasizing the need for user awareness and technical controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include disabling or restricting the use of the Agentic AI integration within Visual Studio Code until a security patch is released. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure of development environments to untrusted networks. 3. Employ endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to monitor for unusual command execution or process behavior related to Visual Studio Code. 4. Educate developers about the risk of interacting with untrusted AI commands or extensions and enforce policies to only install verified extensions from trusted sources. 5. Use application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized code execution triggered by Visual Studio Code processes. 6. Monitor for updates from Microsoft and apply patches promptly once available. 7. Conduct regular code reviews and integrity checks on critical source code repositories to detect unauthorized modifications. 8. Consider deploying multi-factor authentication and enhanced logging on developer workstations to detect and prevent unauthorized access.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Belgium, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-55319: Remote Code Execution in Microsoft Visual Studio Code
Description
Ai command injection in Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-55319 is a high-severity remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting Microsoft Visual Studio Code version 1.0.0. The vulnerability arises from an AI command injection flaw in the integration between Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code. Specifically, an unauthorized attacker can exploit this flaw over a network to execute arbitrary code on the target system without requiring any privileges. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-77, which relates to improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection'). The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.8, reflecting its critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requires user interaction (UI:R). The scope is unchanged (S:U), and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high (C:H/I:H/A:H). The exploitability level is official (RL:O) and confirmed (RC:C). Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data theft, or disruption of development environments. The lack of available patches at the time of publication increases the urgency for mitigation. This vulnerability is particularly concerning because Visual Studio Code is widely used by developers globally, and the integration with AI command features introduces a novel attack surface that can be leveraged remotely. Attackers could craft malicious inputs or commands that the AI component processes, triggering command injection and code execution on the victim's machine.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for software development firms, IT service providers, and enterprises relying heavily on Visual Studio Code for their development workflows. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive source code, intellectual property theft, insertion of malicious code into software projects, and disruption of development pipelines. This could have downstream effects on software supply chains, potentially affecting customers and partners. Additionally, compromised developer machines could serve as footholds for lateral movement within corporate networks, increasing the risk of broader breaches. Given the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, organizations could face operational downtime, reputational damage, and regulatory consequences under GDPR if personal data is exposed or manipulated. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering could be used to trick developers into triggering the exploit, emphasizing the need for user awareness and technical controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include disabling or restricting the use of the Agentic AI integration within Visual Studio Code until a security patch is released. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure of development environments to untrusted networks. 3. Employ endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to monitor for unusual command execution or process behavior related to Visual Studio Code. 4. Educate developers about the risk of interacting with untrusted AI commands or extensions and enforce policies to only install verified extensions from trusted sources. 5. Use application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized code execution triggered by Visual Studio Code processes. 6. Monitor for updates from Microsoft and apply patches promptly once available. 7. Conduct regular code reviews and integrity checks on critical source code repositories to detect unauthorized modifications. 8. Consider deploying multi-factor authentication and enhanced logging on developer workstations to detect and prevent unauthorized access.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- microsoft
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-12T20:19:59.422Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68c3778f563d4c3db0630929
Added to database: 9/12/2025, 1:29:51 AM
Last enriched: 9/27/2025, 12:31:19 AM
Last updated: 10/30/2025, 4:03:30 PM
Views: 346
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-12516: CWE-394 Unexpected Status Code or Return Value in Azure Access Technology BLU-IC2
CriticalCVE-2025-12515: CWE-394 Unexpected Status Code or Return Value in Azure Access Technology BLU-IC2
CriticalCVE-2025-61117: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-12517: CWE-448 Obsolete Feature in UI in Azure Access Technology BLU-IC2
LowCVE-2025-61116: n/a
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.