VulnerabilityPublished 3 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-5544: aaluoxiang oa_system · Path Traversal

Affects aaluoxiang oa_systemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 53% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 24 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data, especially parameters used in file path construction, to prevent path traversal sequences. Employing allowlists for file paths or restricting file access to specific directories can mitigate exploitation. Since no official patches are currently available, organizations should monitor vendor communications for updates or hotfixes. In the interim, deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block path traversal attempts can provide a protective layer. Conducting code reviews and penetration testing focused on file handling functions within the oa_system is advisable. Additionally, restricting file system permissions for the application process to the minimum necessary scope limits the potential damage from exploitation. Logging and monitoring access to sensitive files can help detect suspicious activity early. Finally, organizations should maintain an inventory of affected systems and ensure rapid deployment of patches once released.

Description

A vulnerability was found in aaluoxiang oa_system up to 5b445a6227b51cee287bd0c7c33ed94b801a82a5. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function image of the file src/main/java/cn/gson/oasys/controller/user/UserpanelController.java. The manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available.

Impact

For European organizations using the aaluoxiang oa_system, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data disclosure. Given the medium severity and the ability to exploit remotely without authentication or user interaction, attackers could leverage this flaw to access sensitive internal files, leading to potential data breaches. This is particularly concerning for organizations handling personal data under GDPR, as unauthorized access could result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage. The limited impact on integrity and availability reduces the risk of system disruption or data tampering; however, the confidentiality breach alone is significant. Since the product uses continuous delivery with rolling releases, organizations may face challenges in tracking vulnerable versions and applying timely updates. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, but public disclosure increases the likelihood of future exploitation attempts. European entities relying on this system for internal communications, document management, or workflow automation should consider this vulnerability a moderate threat to their data security posture.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Jul 2025, 20:41 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats