CVE-2025-55734: CWE-862: Missing Authorization in DogukanUrker FlaskBlog
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is "admin" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-55734 is a medium-severity vulnerability classified under CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) affecting DogukanUrker's FlaskBlog application versions 2.8.0 and earlier. FlaskBlog is a blog platform built using the Flask web framework. The vulnerability arises due to improper authorization checks on certain administrative subroutes. Specifically, while the primary /admin page correctly verifies if a user has the 'admin' role, this authorization check is absent on related subroutes such as /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments. The code responsible for enforcing user role verification exists only in routes/adminPanel.py but is missing in routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. This flaw allows unauthorized users to bypass intended access controls and gain access to sensitive administrative pages, potentially exposing confidential data or allowing unauthorized content management. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9, reflecting a network-exploitable vulnerability that requires no authentication or user interaction, with limited confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of now.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using FlaskBlog, especially those deploying versions 2.8.0 or earlier, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data exposure and administrative access. Attackers can access sensitive administrative interfaces without proper credentials, potentially leading to leakage of private blog content, user data, or internal comments. This could damage organizational reputation, violate data protection regulations such as GDPR, and lead to compliance penalties. Although the vulnerability does not directly allow data modification or service disruption, unauthorized read access to administrative content can facilitate further attacks or information gathering. Organizations running FlaskBlog in sectors like media, education, or government within Europe may face increased risk due to the sensitivity of their content and regulatory scrutiny.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately upgrade FlaskBlog to a version later than 2.8.0 where this authorization flaw is patched. If an upgrade is not immediately feasible, implement manual authorization checks on all administrative subroutes, ensuring that user roles are verified consistently across all admin-related endpoints. Conduct a thorough code review of all route handlers to confirm that authorization logic is uniformly applied. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block unauthorized access attempts to admin subpaths. Additionally, enable detailed logging and monitoring of access to administrative URLs to detect suspicious activity. Regularly audit user roles and permissions to minimize the risk of privilege escalation. Finally, consider isolating the admin interface behind VPNs or IP allowlists to reduce exposure.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-55734: CWE-862: Missing Authorization in DogukanUrker FlaskBlog
Description
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, the code checks if the userRole is "admin" only when visiting the /admin page, but not when visiting its subroutes. Specifically, only the file routes/adminPanel.py checks the user role when a user is trying to access the admin page, but that control is not done for the pages routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. Thus, an unauthorized user can bypass the intended restrictions, leaking sensitive data and accessing the following pages: /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-55734 is a medium-severity vulnerability classified under CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) affecting DogukanUrker's FlaskBlog application versions 2.8.0 and earlier. FlaskBlog is a blog platform built using the Flask web framework. The vulnerability arises due to improper authorization checks on certain administrative subroutes. Specifically, while the primary /admin page correctly verifies if a user has the 'admin' role, this authorization check is absent on related subroutes such as /admin/posts, /adminpanel/posts, /admin/comments, and /adminpanel/comments. The code responsible for enforcing user role verification exists only in routes/adminPanel.py but is missing in routes/adminPanelComments.py and routes/adminPanelPosts.py. This flaw allows unauthorized users to bypass intended access controls and gain access to sensitive administrative pages, potentially exposing confidential data or allowing unauthorized content management. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9, reflecting a network-exploitable vulnerability that requires no authentication or user interaction, with limited confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of now.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using FlaskBlog, especially those deploying versions 2.8.0 or earlier, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data exposure and administrative access. Attackers can access sensitive administrative interfaces without proper credentials, potentially leading to leakage of private blog content, user data, or internal comments. This could damage organizational reputation, violate data protection regulations such as GDPR, and lead to compliance penalties. Although the vulnerability does not directly allow data modification or service disruption, unauthorized read access to administrative content can facilitate further attacks or information gathering. Organizations running FlaskBlog in sectors like media, education, or government within Europe may face increased risk due to the sensitivity of their content and regulatory scrutiny.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately upgrade FlaskBlog to a version later than 2.8.0 where this authorization flaw is patched. If an upgrade is not immediately feasible, implement manual authorization checks on all administrative subroutes, ensuring that user roles are verified consistently across all admin-related endpoints. Conduct a thorough code review of all route handlers to confirm that authorization logic is uniformly applied. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block unauthorized access attempts to admin subpaths. Additionally, enable detailed logging and monitoring of access to administrative URLs to detect suspicious activity. Regularly audit user roles and permissions to minimize the risk of privilege escalation. Finally, consider isolating the admin interface behind VPNs or IP allowlists to reduce exposure.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-14T22:31:17.683Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68a4c6efad5a09ad00fa2973
Added to database: 8/19/2025, 6:48:15 PM
Last enriched: 8/19/2025, 7:03:20 PM
Last updated: 8/19/2025, 7:32:50 PM
Views: 2
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9165: Memory Leak in LibTIFF
MediumCVE-2025-9157: Use After Free in appneta tcpreplay
MediumCVE-2025-51529: n/a
MediumCVE-2025-50579: n/a
MediumCVE-2025-55740: CWE-1392: Use of Default Credentials in Anipaleja nginx-defender
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.