CVE-2025-58116VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-58116: I-O DATA DEVICE WN-7D36QR · OS Command Injection

Affects I-O DATA DEVICE WN-7D36QRSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.2 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.2High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 65% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting administrative access to the affected devices to trusted networks and users only, employing strong, unique passwords and multi-factor authentication where possible to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 2. Network segmentation should be enforced to limit the exposure of these devices to untrusted networks or users. 3. Monitor device logs and network traffic for unusual command execution patterns or unauthorized access attempts. 4. Disable any unnecessary services or remote management features on the devices to reduce the attack surface. 5. Regularly check for firmware updates from I-O DATA DEVICE, INC. and apply patches promptly once available. 6. If patching is delayed, consider replacing affected devices with alternative hardware that does not have this vulnerability. 7. Conduct internal audits to ensure that credentials used for device access are not reused elsewhere and are rotated regularly. 8. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to detect potential exploitation attempts targeting these devices. 9. Educate network administrators about the vulnerability and the importance of secure management practices for network hardware.

Description

Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in WN-7D36QR and WN-7D36QR/UE. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote authenticated attacker.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for those relying on the WN-7D36QR devices in their network infrastructure. Successful exploitation could lead to full compromise of the device, allowing attackers to intercept, modify, or disrupt network traffic, exfiltrate sensitive data, or pivot to other internal systems. The high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability means critical business operations could be disrupted, sensitive information leaked, or network trust undermined. Given the requirement for authentication, insider threats or compromised credentials pose a notable risk vector. Additionally, the lack of known exploits in the wild should not lead to complacency, as attackers often develop exploits rapidly once vulnerabilities are public. European organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure, which rely heavily on secure network devices, may face increased risk. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in targeted attacks or espionage campaigns, especially given the geopolitical importance of certain European regions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2025, 03:47 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats