Skip to main content
DashboardThreatsMapFeedsAPI
reconnecting
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-58255: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in yonisink Custom Post Type Images

0
Critical
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-58255cvecve-2025-58255cwe-352
Published: Mon Sep 22 2025 (09/22/2025, 18:23:25 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: yonisink
Product: Custom Post Type Images

Description

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in yonisink Custom Post Type Images allows Code Injection. This issue affects Custom Post Type Images: from n/a through 0.5.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 09/30/2025, 01:12:03 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-58255 is a critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the yonisink Custom Post Type Images plugin, versions up to 0.5. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of an authenticated user by tricking them into submitting a forged request. Specifically, the CSRF flaw can be exploited to inject malicious code, leading to code injection attacks. The vulnerability is characterized by the absence of proper CSRF protections, such as anti-CSRF tokens or validation mechanisms, enabling attackers to bypass authentication and authorization controls. The CVSS 3.1 score of 9.6 reflects the high severity, with network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The scope is changed (S:C), indicating that exploitation affects resources beyond the vulnerable component, with high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the potential for severe damage is significant due to the ability to inject code remotely. The vulnerability affects the yonisink Custom Post Type Images plugin, which is commonly used in WordPress environments to manage and display custom image post types, often in content management and e-commerce sites. The lack of available patches at the time of publication increases the urgency for mitigation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk, especially for those relying on WordPress sites utilizing the yonisink Custom Post Type Images plugin. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, resulting in data breaches, website defacement, malware distribution, or full system compromise. This could disrupt business operations, damage reputation, and lead to regulatory non-compliance under GDPR due to potential data exposure. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and e-commerce are particularly vulnerable given their reliance on web applications and the sensitivity of their data. Additionally, the ability to execute code remotely without authentication amplifies the threat landscape, potentially enabling attackers to pivot within networks or deploy ransomware. The requirement for user interaction (e.g., visiting a malicious link) means social engineering could be leveraged, increasing the attack surface. The absence of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive defense, but the critical severity demands immediate attention.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Immediately audit all WordPress installations for the presence of the yonisink Custom Post Type Images plugin and identify affected versions (up to 0.5). 2) If possible, disable or remove the plugin until a security patch is released. 3) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious CSRF attempts targeting the plugin's endpoints. 4) Educate users and administrators about the risks of clicking unsolicited links to reduce the likelihood of successful social engineering. 5) Monitor web server and application logs for unusual POST requests or patterns indicative of CSRF exploitation attempts. 6) Implement strict Content Security Policies (CSP) and SameSite cookie attributes to reduce CSRF risks. 7) Once a vendor patch is available, prioritize immediate deployment and verify the effectiveness of the fix. 8) Consider deploying multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative access to reduce the impact of compromised sessions. 9) Regularly back up website data and configurations to enable rapid recovery if compromise occurs.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Patchstack
Date Reserved
2025-08-27T16:19:53.146Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68d194cea6a0abbafb7a3bea

Added to database: 9/22/2025, 6:26:22 PM

Last enriched: 9/30/2025, 1:12:03 AM

Last updated: 10/7/2025, 3:41:04 PM

Views: 2

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats