CVE-2025-58258: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in nK Lazy Blocks
Missing Authorization vulnerability in nK Lazy Blocks allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Lazy Blocks: from n/a through 4.1.0.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-58258 is a Missing Authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) identified in the nK Lazy Blocks plugin, affecting versions up to 4.1.0. Lazy Blocks is a tool commonly used in WordPress environments to create custom blocks for the Gutenberg editor, enabling users to design and manage content blocks without coding. The vulnerability arises from incorrectly configured access control mechanisms, allowing users with limited privileges (requiring at least low-level privileges, as indicated by PR:L) to perform actions or access resources that should be restricted. Specifically, the flaw is due to missing or insufficient authorization checks within the plugin's functionality, which could enable an authenticated user with some level of access to bypass intended restrictions. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium severity), with the vector indicating network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring privileges (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), limited confidentiality impact (C:L), and no impact on integrity or availability (I:N/A:N). No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet, suggesting that remediation may still be pending or in progress. This vulnerability primarily affects the confidentiality of data accessible through the plugin's features, potentially exposing sensitive content or configuration details to unauthorized users within the WordPress environment.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress sites with the nK Lazy Blocks plugin, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive content or configuration data managed via the plugin. Although the impact is limited to confidentiality and does not affect integrity or availability, unauthorized access to internal content blocks or metadata could facilitate further reconnaissance or targeted attacks. Organizations in sectors such as media, e-commerce, education, and government that rely on WordPress for content management may be particularly at risk if they have not restricted user privileges appropriately. Since exploitation requires at least some level of authenticated access, the threat is more significant in environments with multiple users or contributors, such as collaborative editorial teams or customer portals. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the medium severity score and network accessibility mean that attackers could potentially leverage this vulnerability as part of a broader attack chain. Compliance with European data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could be impacted if unauthorized data disclosure occurs, leading to legal and reputational consequences.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific steps to mitigate this vulnerability: 1) Immediately audit user roles and permissions within WordPress to ensure that only trusted users have access to functionalities provided by the Lazy Blocks plugin. 2) Temporarily restrict or disable the Lazy Blocks plugin if it is not critical to operations until a security patch is released. 3) Monitor WordPress logs for unusual access patterns or privilege escalations related to the plugin's features. 4) Engage with the plugin vendor or community to obtain updates or patches addressing this vulnerability as soon as they become available. 5) Implement web application firewalls (WAF) with rules that can detect and block suspicious requests targeting the plugin endpoints. 6) Educate content editors and administrators about the risk of privilege misuse and enforce strong authentication mechanisms, including multi-factor authentication (MFA), to reduce the risk of compromised accounts. 7) Regularly backup WordPress site data and configurations to enable rapid recovery if unauthorized changes occur. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on access control auditing, temporary plugin management, and proactive monitoring tailored to the specific nature of this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-58258: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in nK Lazy Blocks
Description
Missing Authorization vulnerability in nK Lazy Blocks allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Lazy Blocks: from n/a through 4.1.0.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-58258 is a Missing Authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) identified in the nK Lazy Blocks plugin, affecting versions up to 4.1.0. Lazy Blocks is a tool commonly used in WordPress environments to create custom blocks for the Gutenberg editor, enabling users to design and manage content blocks without coding. The vulnerability arises from incorrectly configured access control mechanisms, allowing users with limited privileges (requiring at least low-level privileges, as indicated by PR:L) to perform actions or access resources that should be restricted. Specifically, the flaw is due to missing or insufficient authorization checks within the plugin's functionality, which could enable an authenticated user with some level of access to bypass intended restrictions. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium severity), with the vector indicating network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring privileges (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), limited confidentiality impact (C:L), and no impact on integrity or availability (I:N/A:N). No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet, suggesting that remediation may still be pending or in progress. This vulnerability primarily affects the confidentiality of data accessible through the plugin's features, potentially exposing sensitive content or configuration details to unauthorized users within the WordPress environment.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress sites with the nK Lazy Blocks plugin, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive content or configuration data managed via the plugin. Although the impact is limited to confidentiality and does not affect integrity or availability, unauthorized access to internal content blocks or metadata could facilitate further reconnaissance or targeted attacks. Organizations in sectors such as media, e-commerce, education, and government that rely on WordPress for content management may be particularly at risk if they have not restricted user privileges appropriately. Since exploitation requires at least some level of authenticated access, the threat is more significant in environments with multiple users or contributors, such as collaborative editorial teams or customer portals. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the medium severity score and network accessibility mean that attackers could potentially leverage this vulnerability as part of a broader attack chain. Compliance with European data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) could be impacted if unauthorized data disclosure occurs, leading to legal and reputational consequences.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific steps to mitigate this vulnerability: 1) Immediately audit user roles and permissions within WordPress to ensure that only trusted users have access to functionalities provided by the Lazy Blocks plugin. 2) Temporarily restrict or disable the Lazy Blocks plugin if it is not critical to operations until a security patch is released. 3) Monitor WordPress logs for unusual access patterns or privilege escalations related to the plugin's features. 4) Engage with the plugin vendor or community to obtain updates or patches addressing this vulnerability as soon as they become available. 5) Implement web application firewalls (WAF) with rules that can detect and block suspicious requests targeting the plugin endpoints. 6) Educate content editors and administrators about the risk of privilege misuse and enforce strong authentication mechanisms, including multi-factor authentication (MFA), to reduce the risk of compromised accounts. 7) Regularly backup WordPress site data and configurations to enable rapid recovery if unauthorized changes occur. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on access control auditing, temporary plugin management, and proactive monitoring tailored to the specific nature of this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-27T16:19:53.147Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68d194cfa6a0abbafb7a3c07
Added to database: 9/22/2025, 6:26:23 PM
Last enriched: 9/30/2025, 1:12:46 AM
Last updated: 10/7/2025, 1:41:33 PM
Views: 1
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Hackers Stole Data From Public Safety Comms Firm BK Technologies
MediumCVE-2025-11396: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Food Ordering System
MediumCVE-2025-40889: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
HighCVE-2025-40888: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumCVE-2025-40887: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.