CVE-2025-58337VulnerabilityPublished 5 Nov 2025Updated 6 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-58337: Apache Doris-MCP-Server · Improper Access Control

Affects Apache Doris-MCP-ServerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium · fixed in 0.6.0 : update Apache Doris-MCP-Server when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 0.6.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavenorg.apache.doris/doris-mcp-server`pkg:maven/org.apache.doris/doris-mcp-server`Other threats	Affected =0.1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Upgrade Apache Doris-MCP-Server to version 0.6.0 immediately, as this release contains the official fix for CVE-2025-58337. 2. Audit and restrict the issuance of read-only accounts, ensuring they are granted only to trusted users and systems. 3. Implement strict monitoring and alerting on any modification attempts from read-only accounts to detect potential exploitation early. 4. Employ network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of the Doris-MCP-Server to only necessary users and systems. 5. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all accounts, including read-only users, to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 6. Regularly review and update access control policies and permissions to enforce the principle of least privilege rigorously. 7. Conduct periodic security assessments and penetration testing focusing on access control mechanisms within Apache Doris deployments. 8. Maintain comprehensive logging and audit trails for all user activities to facilitate forensic investigations if unauthorized modifications are suspected.

Description

An attacker with a valid read-only account can bypass Doris MCP Server’s read-only mode due to improper access control, allowing modifications that should have been prevented by read-only restrictions. Impact: Bypasses read-only mode; attackers with read-only access may perform unauthorized modifications. Recommended action for operators: Upgrade to version 0.6.0 as soon as possible (this release contains the fix).

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-58337 lies in the potential unauthorized modification of data or configurations within Apache Doris-MCP-Server environments. This can lead to data integrity issues, undermining trust in analytics results or operational decisions based on corrupted data. While confidentiality and availability are less affected, the integrity breach could disrupt business intelligence, reporting, and decision-making processes. Organizations in sectors such as finance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and government that rely on Apache Doris for big data analytics or real-time data processing may face operational risks and compliance challenges if unauthorized changes go undetected. The vulnerability could also be leveraged as a foothold for further internal attacks if attackers escalate privileges after bypassing read-only restrictions. Given the medium severity and ease of exploitation with valid credentials, the threat is significant for environments where read-only accounts are widely used or shared. Failure to patch promptly could expose organizations to insider threats or credential compromise scenarios leading to unauthorized data manipulation.

CWE-284Improper Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Pillar weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #19OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Embedding Scripts within Scripts (opens in a new tab)
Modification of Windows Service Configuration (opens in a new tab)
Malicious Root Certificate (opens in a new tab)
Intent Spoof (opens in a new tab)
WebView Exposure (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Nov 2025, 10:36 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-284

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats