CVE-2025-58457VulnerabilityPublished 24 Sep 2025Updated 4 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-58457: Apache ZooKeeper · Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges

Affects Apache ZooKeeperSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.3 Medium · fixed in 3.9.4 : update Apache ZooKeeper when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.9.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Apache Software Foundation Apache ZooKeeper	Affected =3.9.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-58457, European organizations should prioritize upgrading Apache ZooKeeper to version 3.9.4 or later, where the permission check flaw is corrected. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, administrators should disable the snapshot and restore commands by setting 'admin.snapshot.enabled' and 'admin.restore.enabled' to false in the ZooKeeper configuration. Disabling the entire AdminServer interface via 'admin.enableServer' is another effective mitigation, especially if the AdminServer is not required for operational purposes. Additionally, review and tighten the root ACL permissions to ensure they do not grant open or overly permissive access, keeping in mind that ZooKeeper ACLs are not recursive and child nodes require explicit permissions. Network segmentation and access controls should restrict AdminServer access to trusted clients only. Monitoring and logging AdminServer command usage can help detect anomalous activities. Finally, incorporate this vulnerability into vulnerability management and patching cycles to ensure timely updates and compliance.

Description

Improper permission check in ZooKeeper AdminServer lets authorized clients to run snapshot and restore command with insufficient permissions. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper: from 3.9.0 before 3.9.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.4, which fixes the issue. The issue can be mitigated by disabling both commands (via admin.snapshot.enabled and admin.restore.enabled), disabling the whole AdminServer interface (via admin.enableServer), or ensuring that the root ACL does not provide open permissions. (Note that ZooKeeper ACLs are not recursive, so this does not impact operations on child nodes besides notifications from recursive watches.)

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-58457 centers on the potential unauthorized execution of snapshot and restore commands within Apache ZooKeeper environments. Since ZooKeeper is widely used for coordination services in distributed systems, including cloud infrastructure, big data platforms, and microservices orchestration, exploitation could lead to unauthorized data exposure or state manipulation. This could disrupt service consistency or lead to data leakage, impacting confidentiality. However, the vulnerability does not directly compromise data integrity or availability to a critical extent. Organizations relying on vulnerable versions may face risks of insider threats or compromised internal clients abusing the flaw. The medium severity rating suggests a moderate risk, but the impact could be higher in environments where ZooKeeper manages sensitive or critical infrastructure. European enterprises with complex distributed architectures, especially in sectors like finance, telecommunications, and cloud services, could be affected. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for timely remediation. Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to compliance issues under regulations such as GDPR if unauthorized data access occurs.

CWE-280Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A10:2025: Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (opens in a new tab)
The product does not handle or incorrectly handles when it has insufficient privileges to access resources or functionality as specified by their permissions. This may cause it to follow unexpected code paths that may leave the product in an invalid state.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
Implementation
Always check to see if you have successfully accessed a resource or system functionality, and use proper error handling if it is unsuccessful. Do this even when you are operating in a highly privileged mode, because errors or environmental conditions might still cause a failure.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Nov 2025, 22:10 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-280

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats