CVE-2025-5884VulnerabilityPublished 9 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-5884: Konica Minolta bizhub · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Konica Minolta bizhubSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Konica Minolta bizhub	Affected =20250202	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Network Segmentation: Restrict access to the Konica Minolta bizhub web interfaces to trusted internal networks only, using firewalls and VLAN segmentation to prevent unauthorized external access. 2. Access Controls: Enforce strong authentication and limit user privileges on the device management interface to reduce the risk of exploitation by low-privilege users. 3. Input Validation and Filtering: Although patching is pending, implement web application firewalls (WAFs) or proxy filters that can detect and block suspicious script injections targeting the 'Model Name' parameter. 4. User Awareness: Educate users who interact with the bizhub interfaces about the risks of clicking on unexpected links or entering untrusted data. 5. Monitoring and Logging: Enable detailed logging on the devices and network to detect unusual access patterns or attempts to exploit the XSS vulnerability. 6. Vendor Coordination: Maintain close contact with Konica Minolta for timely release and deployment of official patches or firmware updates addressing CVE-2025-5884. 7. Temporary Workarounds: If possible, disable or restrict the affected component (Display MFP Information List) until a patch is available, or limit the display of the 'Model Name' parameter to trusted inputs only.

Description

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202. This affects an unknown part of the component Display MFP Information List. The manipulation of the argument Model Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the confidentiality and integrity of user sessions interacting with Konica Minolta bizhub devices. Since these devices are commonly used in office environments for printing, scanning, and document management, exploitation could allow attackers to execute malicious scripts in the browsers of users accessing the device's web interface. This could lead to credential theft, session hijacking, or redirection to malicious sites, potentially compromising sensitive corporate information. The impact is heightened in environments where the bizhub devices are accessible over the corporate network or exposed externally, such as in hybrid or remote work scenarios. Additionally, compromised devices could be leveraged as pivot points for further network intrusion or lateral movement. While availability is not directly impacted, the reputational damage and potential data breaches resulting from successful exploitation could be significant. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent exploitation, especially in sectors with strict data protection regulations like GDPR in Europe.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Jul 2025, 19:32 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats