CVE-2025-58845: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Bulk Watermark: from n/a through 1.6.10.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-58845 is a high-severity vulnerability identified in the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin, specifically affecting versions up to 1.6.10. The vulnerability is classified as a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue (CWE-352) that also allows for reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged HTTP request, which the vulnerable application processes without verifying the legitimacy of the request. In this case, the Bulk Watermark plugin does not adequately validate requests, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users. The presence of reflected XSS in conjunction with CSRF increases the attack surface, as attackers can craft malicious URLs or forms that execute arbitrary scripts in the victim's browser context. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 reflects a high severity, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The scope is changed (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the vulnerable component. The impact metrics show low confidentiality (C:L), integrity (I:L), and availability (A:L) impacts, meaning the attacker can cause limited data disclosure, modification, or service disruption. No patches or known exploits in the wild are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly. The plugin is typically used in web environments to bulk watermark images, often integrated into content management systems or websites that handle media assets. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking authenticated users into clicking malicious links or visiting crafted web pages, leading to unauthorized actions such as changing watermark settings or injecting malicious scripts that could steal session tokens or perform other malicious activities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for those relying on the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin within their web infrastructure. The CSRF combined with reflected XSS can lead to unauthorized changes in watermark configurations, potentially compromising the integrity of digital assets. Additionally, the reflected XSS can be leveraged to execute malicious scripts in users' browsers, leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or further exploitation of internal systems. Organizations in sectors such as media, publishing, e-commerce, and digital marketing that use this plugin are particularly at risk. The vulnerability could also be exploited to deface websites or inject misleading watermarks, damaging brand reputation and customer trust. Given the network attack vector and no privilege requirements, attackers can remotely exploit this vulnerability, increasing the threat landscape. Although no known exploits are currently reported, the public disclosure means attackers could develop exploits rapidly. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to trigger the attack. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, while rated low individually, collectively can disrupt business operations and lead to data leakage or unauthorized modifications, which are critical concerns under European data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigation measures: 1) Immediately update the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin to the latest version once a patch is released. In the absence of a patch, consider temporarily disabling the plugin or restricting its usage to trusted users only. 2) Implement anti-CSRF tokens in all forms and state-changing requests related to the plugin to ensure that requests originate from legitimate users. 3) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate the impact of reflected XSS by restricting the execution of unauthorized scripts. 4) Conduct thorough input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data processed by the plugin to prevent script injection. 5) Educate users about phishing and social engineering risks to reduce the likelihood of successful user interaction-based attacks. 6) Monitor web server and application logs for unusual requests or patterns indicative of CSRF or XSS exploitation attempts. 7) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block CSRF and XSS attack vectors targeting the Bulk Watermark plugin. 8) Review and harden authentication and session management mechanisms to limit the impact of session hijacking attempts. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the plugin-specific context and the combined CSRF and XSS nature of the vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-58845: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Bulk Watermark: from n/a through 1.6.10.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-58845 is a high-severity vulnerability identified in the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin, specifically affecting versions up to 1.6.10. The vulnerability is classified as a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue (CWE-352) that also allows for reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged HTTP request, which the vulnerable application processes without verifying the legitimacy of the request. In this case, the Bulk Watermark plugin does not adequately validate requests, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users. The presence of reflected XSS in conjunction with CSRF increases the attack surface, as attackers can craft malicious URLs or forms that execute arbitrary scripts in the victim's browser context. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 reflects a high severity, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The scope is changed (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the vulnerable component. The impact metrics show low confidentiality (C:L), integrity (I:L), and availability (A:L) impacts, meaning the attacker can cause limited data disclosure, modification, or service disruption. No patches or known exploits in the wild are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly. The plugin is typically used in web environments to bulk watermark images, often integrated into content management systems or websites that handle media assets. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking authenticated users into clicking malicious links or visiting crafted web pages, leading to unauthorized actions such as changing watermark settings or injecting malicious scripts that could steal session tokens or perform other malicious activities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk, especially for those relying on the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin within their web infrastructure. The CSRF combined with reflected XSS can lead to unauthorized changes in watermark configurations, potentially compromising the integrity of digital assets. Additionally, the reflected XSS can be leveraged to execute malicious scripts in users' browsers, leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or further exploitation of internal systems. Organizations in sectors such as media, publishing, e-commerce, and digital marketing that use this plugin are particularly at risk. The vulnerability could also be exploited to deface websites or inject misleading watermarks, damaging brand reputation and customer trust. Given the network attack vector and no privilege requirements, attackers can remotely exploit this vulnerability, increasing the threat landscape. Although no known exploits are currently reported, the public disclosure means attackers could develop exploits rapidly. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to trigger the attack. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, while rated low individually, collectively can disrupt business operations and lead to data leakage or unauthorized modifications, which are critical concerns under European data protection regulations such as GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigation measures: 1) Immediately update the ChrisHurst Bulk Watermark plugin to the latest version once a patch is released. In the absence of a patch, consider temporarily disabling the plugin or restricting its usage to trusted users only. 2) Implement anti-CSRF tokens in all forms and state-changing requests related to the plugin to ensure that requests originate from legitimate users. 3) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate the impact of reflected XSS by restricting the execution of unauthorized scripts. 4) Conduct thorough input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data processed by the plugin to prevent script injection. 5) Educate users about phishing and social engineering risks to reduce the likelihood of successful user interaction-based attacks. 6) Monitor web server and application logs for unusual requests or patterns indicative of CSRF or XSS exploitation attempts. 7) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block CSRF and XSS attack vectors targeting the Bulk Watermark plugin. 8) Review and harden authentication and session management mechanisms to limit the impact of session hijacking attempts. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the plugin-specific context and the combined CSRF and XSS nature of the vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-05T10:49:49.115Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68baeaa457c5b37b67a460f2
Added to database: 9/5/2025, 1:50:28 PM
Last enriched: 9/5/2025, 1:58:34 PM
Last updated: 9/5/2025, 8:04:45 PM
Views: 2
Related Threats
CVE-2025-58370: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in RooCodeInc Roo-Code
HighCVE-2025-58369: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in typelevel fs2
MediumCVE-2025-58367: CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes in seperman deepdiff
CriticalCVE-2025-58366: CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials in InseeFrLab onyxia
CriticalCVE-2025-10027: Cross Site Scripting in itsourcecode POS Point of Sale System
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.