CVE-2025-58968: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in Christiaan Pieterse MaxiBlocks
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Christiaan Pieterse MaxiBlocks allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects MaxiBlocks: from n/a through 2.1.3.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-58968 is a Missing Authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) identified in the MaxiBlocks product developed by Christiaan Pieterse. This vulnerability arises due to incorrectly configured access control security levels, allowing an attacker with some level of privileges (low privileges, as indicated by PR:L) to bypass authorization checks. The vulnerability affects MaxiBlocks versions up to 2.1.3, though specific affected versions are not fully enumerated. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.0 (medium severity), with the vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N. This means the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires low privileges but no user interaction, and has a scope change (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. The impact primarily affects confidentiality to a limited extent (C:L), with no impact on integrity or availability. The vulnerability allows unauthorized access to resources or data that should be restricted, potentially exposing sensitive information or enabling further exploitation. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches are linked yet, indicating that remediation may still be pending or in development. The vulnerability is significant because access control flaws can lead to privilege escalation or unauthorized data exposure, especially in environments where MaxiBlocks is used to manage critical or sensitive data blocks or components.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using MaxiBlocks, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data or system components, potentially violating data protection regulations such as GDPR if personal or confidential data is exposed. The scope change indicates that the attacker could access resources beyond their initial privileges, increasing the risk of lateral movement within networks or unauthorized data disclosure. While the impact on integrity and availability is not indicated, the confidentiality impact alone can have serious consequences, including reputational damage, regulatory fines, and operational disruptions. Organizations in sectors like finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure that rely on MaxiBlocks for data management or block handling could be particularly affected. The medium severity score suggests that while the vulnerability is not immediately critical, it should be addressed promptly to avoid exploitation, especially since it requires only low privileges and no user interaction, making it easier for insiders or compromised accounts to exploit.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict access control policies and review all authorization configurations in MaxiBlocks to ensure that access permissions are correctly enforced according to the principle of least privilege. 2. Conduct thorough audits of user roles and privileges within MaxiBlocks to identify and remediate any misconfigurations or excessive permissions. 3. Monitor logs and access patterns for unusual or unauthorized access attempts that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4. Apply any available patches or updates from the vendor as soon as they are released, and maintain close communication with Christiaan Pieterse or MaxiBlocks support channels for security advisories. 5. Employ network segmentation and zero-trust principles to limit the impact of any unauthorized access gained through this vulnerability. 6. Consider implementing additional compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) for accessing MaxiBlocks management interfaces to reduce the risk of low-privilege account compromise. 7. Educate administrators and users about the importance of secure configuration and monitoring to detect and prevent exploitation of access control weaknesses.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Sweden
CVE-2025-58968: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in Christiaan Pieterse MaxiBlocks
Description
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Christiaan Pieterse MaxiBlocks allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects MaxiBlocks: from n/a through 2.1.3.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-58968 is a Missing Authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) identified in the MaxiBlocks product developed by Christiaan Pieterse. This vulnerability arises due to incorrectly configured access control security levels, allowing an attacker with some level of privileges (low privileges, as indicated by PR:L) to bypass authorization checks. The vulnerability affects MaxiBlocks versions up to 2.1.3, though specific affected versions are not fully enumerated. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.0 (medium severity), with the vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N. This means the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires low privileges but no user interaction, and has a scope change (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. The impact primarily affects confidentiality to a limited extent (C:L), with no impact on integrity or availability. The vulnerability allows unauthorized access to resources or data that should be restricted, potentially exposing sensitive information or enabling further exploitation. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches are linked yet, indicating that remediation may still be pending or in development. The vulnerability is significant because access control flaws can lead to privilege escalation or unauthorized data exposure, especially in environments where MaxiBlocks is used to manage critical or sensitive data blocks or components.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using MaxiBlocks, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data or system components, potentially violating data protection regulations such as GDPR if personal or confidential data is exposed. The scope change indicates that the attacker could access resources beyond their initial privileges, increasing the risk of lateral movement within networks or unauthorized data disclosure. While the impact on integrity and availability is not indicated, the confidentiality impact alone can have serious consequences, including reputational damage, regulatory fines, and operational disruptions. Organizations in sectors like finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure that rely on MaxiBlocks for data management or block handling could be particularly affected. The medium severity score suggests that while the vulnerability is not immediately critical, it should be addressed promptly to avoid exploitation, especially since it requires only low privileges and no user interaction, making it easier for insiders or compromised accounts to exploit.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict access control policies and review all authorization configurations in MaxiBlocks to ensure that access permissions are correctly enforced according to the principle of least privilege. 2. Conduct thorough audits of user roles and privileges within MaxiBlocks to identify and remediate any misconfigurations or excessive permissions. 3. Monitor logs and access patterns for unusual or unauthorized access attempts that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4. Apply any available patches or updates from the vendor as soon as they are released, and maintain close communication with Christiaan Pieterse or MaxiBlocks support channels for security advisories. 5. Employ network segmentation and zero-trust principles to limit the impact of any unauthorized access gained through this vulnerability. 6. Consider implementing additional compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) for accessing MaxiBlocks management interfaces to reduce the risk of low-privilege account compromise. 7. Educate administrators and users about the importance of secure configuration and monitoring to detect and prevent exploitation of access control weaknesses.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-06T04:45:10.579Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68d197d705d26ef4152508f9
Added to database: 9/22/2025, 6:39:19 PM
Last enriched: 9/30/2025, 1:02:41 AM
Last updated: 10/7/2025, 1:52:02 PM
Views: 9
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Hackers Stole Data From Public Safety Comms Firm BK Technologies
MediumCVE-2025-11396: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Food Ordering System
MediumCVE-2025-40889: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
HighCVE-2025-40888: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumCVE-2025-40887: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Nozomi Networks Guardian
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.