CVE-2025-59101: dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k5 · Reliance on IP Address for Authentication
Affects dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k5Source CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.7 High.
Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 54% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| dormakabaAccess Manager 92xx-k5 | Affected
| Fixed in– |
| dormakabaAccess Manager 92xx-k7 | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2025-59101, European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Immediately identify all instances of dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k5 in their environment and verify the version to determine exposure. 2) Apply vendor patches or updates as soon as they become available to replace the flawed IP-based authentication mechanism with a secure session management approach. 3) Until patches are deployed, restrict network access to the Access Manager interface using network segmentation, firewall rules, and access control lists to limit connections to trusted hosts and networks. 4) Implement strong network monitoring and anomaly detection to identify suspicious IP spoofing attempts or unusual access patterns. 5) Use VPNs or encrypted tunnels with mutual authentication to access the management interface, reducing the risk of IP spoofing on untrusted networks. 6) Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) at the network or application layer if supported, adding an additional layer beyond IP verification. 7) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on access management systems to detect weaknesses and validate controls. 8) Educate IT and security teams about the risks of IP-based authentication and the importance of secure session handling. These targeted measures will reduce the attack surface and protect critical access management infrastructure until a permanent fix is applied.
Description
Instead of typical session tokens or cookies, it is verified on a per-request basis if the originating IP address has once successfully logged in. As soon as an authentication request from a certain source IP is successful, the IP address is handled as authenticated. No other session information is stored. Therefore, it is possible to spoof the IP address of a logged-in user to gain access to the Access Manager web interface.