CVE-2025-59152: CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision in litestar-org litestar
Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. In version 2.17.0, rate limits can be completely bypassed by manipulating the X-Forwarded-For header. This renders IP-based rate limiting ineffective against determined attackers. Litestar's RateLimitMiddleware uses `cache_key_from_request()` to generate cache keys for rate limiting. When an X-Forwarded-For header is present, the middleware trusts it unconditionally and uses its value as part of the client identifier. Since clients can set arbitrary X-Forwarded-For values, each different spoofed IP creates a separate rate limit bucket. An attacker can rotate through different header values to avoid hitting any single bucket's limit. This affects any Litestar application using RateLimitMiddleware with default settings, which likely includes most applications that implement rate limiting. Version 2.18.0 contains a patch for the vulnerability.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability CVE-2025-59152 affects Litestar version 2.17.0, an ASGI framework widely used for asynchronous Python web applications. The issue lies in the RateLimitMiddleware component, which implements IP-based rate limiting by generating cache keys from client IP addresses. When the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header is present, the middleware trusts this header without validation and uses its value as the client identifier for rate limiting. Since the X-Forwarded-For header can be arbitrarily set by clients, attackers can spoof different IP addresses in this header to create multiple distinct rate limit buckets. This allows attackers to bypass rate limits by rotating through spoofed IP addresses, effectively nullifying the rate limiting protection. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-807 (Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision). The CVSS v3.1 score is 7.5 (high), reflecting the ease of exploitation (no authentication or user interaction required), network attack vector, and the significant impact on availability. The flaw does not compromise confidentiality or integrity but enables denial-of-service conditions by allowing attackers to flood services without restriction. The issue was reserved on 2025-09-09 and published on 2025-10-06. Litestar version 2.18.0 includes a patch that corrects this behavior by presumably validating or ignoring untrusted X-Forwarded-For headers for rate limiting purposes. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to service availability, especially for those relying on Litestar 2.17.0 with default RateLimitMiddleware settings. Attackers can bypass rate limits and launch denial-of-service attacks, potentially causing service outages or degraded performance. This can affect customer-facing applications, internal APIs, and critical infrastructure relying on Litestar. The inability to enforce effective rate limiting may also increase the risk of automated abuse, credential stuffing, or brute-force attacks. While confidentiality and integrity remain intact, the availability impact can disrupt business operations, damage reputation, and incur financial losses. Organizations in sectors with high availability requirements, such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, are particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the flaw could be exploited as part of multi-vector attacks, compounding risks. The lack of authentication or user interaction for exploitation means attackers can operate remotely and anonymously, increasing the threat surface.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade Litestar to version 2.18.0 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Until the upgrade is applied, organizations should implement additional controls to validate or sanitize the X-Forwarded-For header before it is used for rate limiting. This can include configuring middleware to trust only headers from known and secure proxies or load balancers, ignoring client-supplied X-Forwarded-For headers from untrusted sources, or using alternative client identification methods such as authenticated tokens or cookies. Network-level protections like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block suspicious header manipulation or IP rotation patterns. Monitoring and alerting on unusual request rates or header anomalies can help detect exploitation attempts early. Additionally, consider implementing rate limiting based on multiple factors (e.g., user accounts, API keys) rather than solely on IP addresses. Conduct thorough testing after applying patches or configuration changes to ensure rate limiting functions as intended without introducing regressions.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2025-59152: CWE-807: Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision in litestar-org litestar
Description
Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. In version 2.17.0, rate limits can be completely bypassed by manipulating the X-Forwarded-For header. This renders IP-based rate limiting ineffective against determined attackers. Litestar's RateLimitMiddleware uses `cache_key_from_request()` to generate cache keys for rate limiting. When an X-Forwarded-For header is present, the middleware trusts it unconditionally and uses its value as part of the client identifier. Since clients can set arbitrary X-Forwarded-For values, each different spoofed IP creates a separate rate limit bucket. An attacker can rotate through different header values to avoid hitting any single bucket's limit. This affects any Litestar application using RateLimitMiddleware with default settings, which likely includes most applications that implement rate limiting. Version 2.18.0 contains a patch for the vulnerability.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability CVE-2025-59152 affects Litestar version 2.17.0, an ASGI framework widely used for asynchronous Python web applications. The issue lies in the RateLimitMiddleware component, which implements IP-based rate limiting by generating cache keys from client IP addresses. When the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header is present, the middleware trusts this header without validation and uses its value as the client identifier for rate limiting. Since the X-Forwarded-For header can be arbitrarily set by clients, attackers can spoof different IP addresses in this header to create multiple distinct rate limit buckets. This allows attackers to bypass rate limits by rotating through spoofed IP addresses, effectively nullifying the rate limiting protection. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-807 (Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision). The CVSS v3.1 score is 7.5 (high), reflecting the ease of exploitation (no authentication or user interaction required), network attack vector, and the significant impact on availability. The flaw does not compromise confidentiality or integrity but enables denial-of-service conditions by allowing attackers to flood services without restriction. The issue was reserved on 2025-09-09 and published on 2025-10-06. Litestar version 2.18.0 includes a patch that corrects this behavior by presumably validating or ignoring untrusted X-Forwarded-For headers for rate limiting purposes. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to service availability, especially for those relying on Litestar 2.17.0 with default RateLimitMiddleware settings. Attackers can bypass rate limits and launch denial-of-service attacks, potentially causing service outages or degraded performance. This can affect customer-facing applications, internal APIs, and critical infrastructure relying on Litestar. The inability to enforce effective rate limiting may also increase the risk of automated abuse, credential stuffing, or brute-force attacks. While confidentiality and integrity remain intact, the availability impact can disrupt business operations, damage reputation, and incur financial losses. Organizations in sectors with high availability requirements, such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, are particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the flaw could be exploited as part of multi-vector attacks, compounding risks. The lack of authentication or user interaction for exploitation means attackers can operate remotely and anonymously, increasing the threat surface.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade Litestar to version 2.18.0 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Until the upgrade is applied, organizations should implement additional controls to validate or sanitize the X-Forwarded-For header before it is used for rate limiting. This can include configuring middleware to trust only headers from known and secure proxies or load balancers, ignoring client-supplied X-Forwarded-For headers from untrusted sources, or using alternative client identification methods such as authenticated tokens or cookies. Network-level protections like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block suspicious header manipulation or IP rotation patterns. Monitoring and alerting on unusual request rates or header anomalies can help detect exploitation attempts early. Additionally, consider implementing rate limiting based on multiple factors (e.g., user accounts, API keys) rather than solely on IP addresses. Conduct thorough testing after applying patches or configuration changes to ensure rate limiting functions as intended without introducing regressions.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-09T15:23:16.327Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68e3e22d0d99582527b656f6
Added to database: 10/6/2025, 3:37:17 PM
Last enriched: 10/6/2025, 3:37:34 PM
Last updated: 10/7/2025, 11:12:43 AM
Views: 9
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-11387: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC15
HighCVE-2025-11386: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC15
HighCVE-2025-11385: Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-11360: Cross Site Scripting in jakowenko double-take
MediumCVE-2025-11359: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Banking System
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.