CVE-2025-59783: CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in 2N Telekomunikace a.s. 2N Access Commander
API endpoint for user synchronization in 2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for OS command injection. This vulnerability can only be exploited after authenticating with administrator privileges.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-59783 identifies an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the 2N Access Commander product by 2N Telekomunikace a.s., specifically affecting version 3.4.1. The vulnerability exists in the API endpoint responsible for user synchronization, where insufficient input validation allows specially crafted input to be interpreted as operating system commands. This flaw enables an attacker with authenticated administrator privileges to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system, potentially leading to full system compromise. The vulnerability requires authentication with high privileges and some user interaction, but no additional complex conditions. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.8 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with network attack vector and low attack complexity. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the critical nature of the affected system, which manages physical access control infrastructure. The lack of available patches at the time of reporting necessitates immediate mitigation efforts by organizations using this product. The vulnerability was reserved in September 2025 and published in March 2026, indicating recent discovery and disclosure.
Potential Impact
The potential impact of CVE-2025-59783 is severe for organizations using 2N Access Commander, as successful exploitation allows attackers with administrator access to execute arbitrary OS commands. This can lead to complete system takeover, unauthorized access to sensitive physical security configurations, disruption of access control services, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within the network. The compromise of physical access control systems can have cascading effects on organizational security, including unauthorized physical entry, safety risks, and regulatory compliance violations. Given the network-exposed API and the critical role of the product in security infrastructure, the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks against enterprises, government agencies, and critical infrastructure operators. The requirement for administrator privileges limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with weak credential management or insider threats.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately restrict administrator access to the 2N Access Commander API endpoint, enforcing strong authentication and monitoring for suspicious activity. Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface to trusted hosts only. Apply strict input validation and sanitization on all API inputs if possible, or deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block command injection patterns. Since no official patches are available yet, coordinate with 2N Telekomunikace a.s. for updates and advisories. Conduct thorough audits of administrator accounts and credentials to prevent unauthorized access. Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all privileged users. Monitor system logs and network traffic for indicators of compromise related to command injection attempts. Prepare incident response plans specific to physical access control system compromises. Finally, consider isolating or temporarily disabling the vulnerable synchronization feature if feasible until a patch is released.
Affected Countries
Czech Republic, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, France, Poland, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Sweden
CVE-2025-59783: CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in 2N Telekomunikace a.s. 2N Access Commander
Description
API endpoint for user synchronization in 2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for OS command injection. This vulnerability can only be exploited after authenticating with administrator privileges.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-59783 identifies an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the 2N Access Commander product by 2N Telekomunikace a.s., specifically affecting version 3.4.1. The vulnerability exists in the API endpoint responsible for user synchronization, where insufficient input validation allows specially crafted input to be interpreted as operating system commands. This flaw enables an attacker with authenticated administrator privileges to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system, potentially leading to full system compromise. The vulnerability requires authentication with high privileges and some user interaction, but no additional complex conditions. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.8 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with network attack vector and low attack complexity. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the critical nature of the affected system, which manages physical access control infrastructure. The lack of available patches at the time of reporting necessitates immediate mitigation efforts by organizations using this product. The vulnerability was reserved in September 2025 and published in March 2026, indicating recent discovery and disclosure.
Potential Impact
The potential impact of CVE-2025-59783 is severe for organizations using 2N Access Commander, as successful exploitation allows attackers with administrator access to execute arbitrary OS commands. This can lead to complete system takeover, unauthorized access to sensitive physical security configurations, disruption of access control services, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within the network. The compromise of physical access control systems can have cascading effects on organizational security, including unauthorized physical entry, safety risks, and regulatory compliance violations. Given the network-exposed API and the critical role of the product in security infrastructure, the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks against enterprises, government agencies, and critical infrastructure operators. The requirement for administrator privileges limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with weak credential management or insider threats.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately restrict administrator access to the 2N Access Commander API endpoint, enforcing strong authentication and monitoring for suspicious activity. Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface to trusted hosts only. Apply strict input validation and sanitization on all API inputs if possible, or deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block command injection patterns. Since no official patches are available yet, coordinate with 2N Telekomunikace a.s. for updates and advisories. Conduct thorough audits of administrator accounts and credentials to prevent unauthorized access. Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all privileged users. Monitor system logs and network traffic for indicators of compromise related to command injection attempts. Prepare incident response plans specific to physical access control system compromises. Finally, consider isolating or temporarily disabling the vulnerable synchronization feature if feasible until a patch is released.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- 2N
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-19T17:22:49.647Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69a850c1d1a09e29cb458b4e
Added to database: 3/4/2026, 3:33:21 PM
Last enriched: 3/4/2026, 3:47:37 PM
Last updated: 3/4/2026, 4:40:33 PM
Views: 3
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-3520: CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion in expressjs multer
HighCVE-2026-28696: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in craftcms cms
HighCVE-2026-28695: CWE-1336: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine in craftcms cms
HighCVE-2026-23812: Vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) HPE Aruba Networking Wireless Operating Systems (AOS-8 & AOS-10)
MediumCVE-2026-23811: Vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) HPE Aruba Networking Wireless Operating Systems (AOS-8 & AOS-10)
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.