CVE-2025-60791VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-60791: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.2 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:15 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.2Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 1% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-60791, European organizations should implement strict local access controls to prevent unauthorized users from accessing systems running Easywork Enterprise. Endpoint security solutions should be configured to detect and alert on debugging tools or suspicious memory analysis activities. Organizations should enforce least privilege principles, limiting user permissions to reduce the risk of local exploitation. Regular monitoring of software license usage and audit logs can help detect anomalies indicating unauthorized activations. Until a vendor patch is released, consider isolating systems running the vulnerable software or using application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized debugging. Engage with the software vendor to obtain updates or patches addressing this vulnerability. Additionally, educate IT staff about the risks of memory analysis attacks and ensure physical security controls are robust to prevent unauthorized physical access to devices.

Description

Easywork Enterprise 2.1.3.354 is vulnerable to Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Memory. The application leaves valid device-bound license keys in process memory after a failed activation attempt. The keys can be obtained by attaching a debugger or analyzing the process/memory dump and then they can be used to activate the software on the same machine without purchasing.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to software licensing compliance and financial controls. Unauthorized extraction and reuse of license keys can lead to unlicensed software usage, potentially violating software agreements and exposing organizations to legal and financial penalties. While the vulnerability does not directly impact system integrity or availability, it undermines the licensing enforcement mechanism, which could encourage software piracy within the organization. Organizations with strict software asset management policies may face audit failures or reputational damage if unauthorized activations are detected. The risk is heightened in environments where local access controls are weak or where endpoint security monitoring is insufficient. However, since exploitation requires local access and is limited to the same device, remote attackers or widespread compromise are unlikely. The vulnerability is less critical for organizations that do not use Easywork Enterprise or have robust endpoint security and access restrictions in place.

CWE-316Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Memory (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product stores sensitive information in cleartext in memory.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.1.6 (opens in a new tab)
V8.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V8.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 16:58 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-316

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats