CVE-2025-60880VulnerabilityPublished 10 Oct 2025Updated 17 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-60880: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.3 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 34% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:N/A:H/C:H/I:L/PR:H/S:C/UI:R

Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Vector: Network
Availability: High
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: Low
Privileges Required: High
Scope: Changed
User Interaction: Required

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting SVG file uploads in the admin panel or disabling SVG support entirely until a patch is available. 2. Implement strict server-side validation and sanitization of uploaded SVG files to remove any embedded scripts or potentially malicious content. 3. Apply Content Security Policy (CSP) headers that restrict script execution contexts and sources within the admin panel to limit the impact of any injected scripts. 4. Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all admin accounts to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 5. Monitor admin panel logs for unusual file uploads or access patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Educate administrators about the risks of opening or interacting with suspicious product entries or files. 7. Stay alert for official patches or updates from Bagisto and apply them promptly once released. 8. Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAF) with rules to detect and block malicious SVG payloads. 9. Regularly audit and review user privileges to ensure only necessary personnel have admin access. These steps provide layered defense beyond generic advice and address the specific attack vector of malicious SVG uploads.

Description

An authenticated stored XSS vulnerability exists in the Bagisto 2.3.6 admin panel's product creation path, allowing an attacker to upload a crafted SVG file containing malicious JavaScript code. This vulnerability can be exploited by an authenticated admin user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, data theft, or unauthorized actions.

Impact

For European organizations using Bagisto 2.3.6, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of their e-commerce platforms. Successful exploitation could lead to administrative session hijacking, enabling attackers to manipulate product data, access sensitive customer information, or disrupt business operations. The stored nature of the XSS means that once a malicious SVG is uploaded, any admin viewing the affected product page could be compromised, potentially leading to widespread impact within the organization. Given the administrative level required to exploit this, insider threats or compromised admin credentials could be leveraged by attackers. The impact extends to reputational damage, regulatory non-compliance (e.g., GDPR breaches due to data theft), and financial losses. The lack of known public exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits post-disclosure. European e-commerce businesses relying on Bagisto should consider this vulnerability critical due to the direct impact on their operational security and customer trust.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Oct 2025, 03:41 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats