CVE-2025-6099VulnerabilityPublished 16 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6099: szluyu99 gin-vue-blog · Improper Authorization

Affects szluyu99 gin-vue-blogSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Given the absence of an official patch due to the rolling release nature of the product, European organizations should implement compensating controls immediately. These include: 1) Restricting network access to the blog server’s PATCH endpoints via firewall rules or API gateways, limiting exposure to trusted IP ranges or internal networks only. 2) Implementing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious PATCH requests or anomalous authorization patterns. 3) Enforcing strict authentication and authorization at the infrastructure or reverse proxy level to supplement the application’s deficient controls. 4) Conducting thorough code reviews and, if feasible, applying temporary code-level fixes to enforce proper authorization checks in the PATCH handler. 5) Monitoring logs for unusual PATCH request activity or unauthorized changes to blog content. 6) Planning for migration or upgrade to a future patched release once available, and engaging with the vendor or open-source maintainers for status updates. 7) Educating administrators and users about the risk and signs of exploitation to enhance detection and response capabilities.

Description

A vulnerability was found in szluyu99 gin-vue-blog up to 61dd11ccd296e8642a318ada3ef7b3f7776d2410. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file gin-blog-server/internal/manager.go of the component PATCH Request Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

Impact

For European organizations using the gin-vue-blog platform, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized content manipulation, which can lead to misinformation, defacement, or unauthorized configuration changes. This could damage organizational reputation, especially for entities relying on the blog for public communication or internal knowledge sharing. Although the vulnerability does not directly impact confidentiality or availability, integrity breaches can have cascading effects, such as spreading false information or enabling further attacks through manipulated content. Organizations in sectors like media, education, and government that use this blogging platform may face increased risk. The lack of a patch and the rolling release model complicate timely mitigation, increasing exposure time. Furthermore, since exploitation requires no authentication or user interaction, attackers can remotely and stealthily exploit this flaw, increasing the threat surface. The medium severity rating suggests a moderate but non-negligible impact, warranting prompt attention to prevent potential misuse.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…