VulnerabilityPublished 25 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-62497: Sony SNC-CX600W · Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Affects Sony SNC-CX600WSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.1 Low : upgrade to 2.8.0 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

3.1Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 1% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.8.0

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Sony SNC-CX600W to 2.8.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Sony Corporation SNC-CX600W	Affected <2.8.0	Fixed in 2.8.0

AI-suggested

Immediately update all Sony SNC-CX600W cameras to firmware version 2.8.0 or later, which addresses this CSRF vulnerability.
Restrict access to the camera management interface by implementing network segmentation and firewall rules to limit access only to trusted management networks or VPNs.
Employ web browser security best practices, such as disabling automatic login persistence and using separate browsers or profiles for device management to reduce the risk of session hijacking.
Educate users with access to camera management interfaces about the risks of clicking on unknown or suspicious links while logged in to sensitive systems.
Monitor network traffic for unusual requests to camera management endpoints that could indicate attempted exploitation.
Consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for camera management interfaces if supported, to reduce risk from session hijacking or CSRF attacks.
Regularly audit camera configurations and logs to detect unauthorized changes promptly.

Description

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in SNC-CX600W versions prior to Ver.2.8.0. If a user accesses a specially crafted webpage while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-62497 is primarily related to the integrity of surveillance systems. Unauthorized configuration changes could disable or alter camera functions, potentially creating blind spots or misconfigurations that reduce security monitoring effectiveness. This could be exploited in targeted attacks against critical infrastructure, government facilities, or corporate environments relying on these cameras for physical security. While confidentiality and availability impacts are minimal, the integrity compromise could facilitate further attacks or evade detection. The requirement for user interaction and an active session limits mass exploitation, but insider threats or social engineering could increase risk. Organizations with extensive deployments of Sony SNC-CX600W cameras, especially in sectors like transportation, public safety, and industrial control, may face operational disruptions or increased security risks if this vulnerability is exploited.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 2 Dec 2025, 05:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats