CVE-2025-63454VulnerabilityPublished 31 Oct 2025Updated 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-63454: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 31 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Immediately identify and inventory all Tenda AX-3 routers within the network environment to assess exposure. 2. Implement network segmentation to isolate vulnerable routers from critical infrastructure and sensitive systems, limiting attack propagation. 3. Deploy intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with custom signatures to detect and block anomalous requests targeting the get_parentControl_list_Info function or suspicious deviceId parameter patterns. 4. Restrict remote management interfaces and disable unnecessary services on affected routers to reduce attack vectors. 5. Monitor network traffic for unusual spikes or repeated malformed requests indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Engage with Tenda support channels to obtain firmware updates or patches as soon as they become available and plan prompt deployment. 7. Consider temporary replacement or upgrade of vulnerable devices with models confirmed to be secure. 8. Educate IT staff and users about the vulnerability and encourage vigilance for network disruptions that may signal exploitation. 9. Maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans to quickly recover from potential DoS incidents. 10. Coordinate with cybersecurity information sharing organizations to stay informed on emerging exploit developments.

Description

Tenda AX-3 v16.03.12.10_CN was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the deviceId parameter in the get_parentControl_list_Info function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted request.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-63454 is the potential for network outages caused by Denial of Service attacks against Tenda AX-3 routers. This can disrupt internet access, internal communications, and connected services, leading to operational downtime and productivity losses. Small businesses and home office users relying on these routers may experience connectivity interruptions, affecting remote work and business continuity. Critical infrastructure or service providers using these devices at network edges could face service degradation or outages, impacting customers and stakeholders. Although no data confidentiality or integrity compromise is reported, availability loss can have cascading effects on dependent systems and services. The absence of authentication and user interaction requirements means attackers can launch attacks remotely and at scale, increasing the threat surface. European organizations with limited network segmentation or monitoring may be more vulnerable to exploitation. The lack of an official patch at the time of disclosure necessitates interim protective measures to mitigate risk.

CWE-121Stack-based Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #14
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation
Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

github.com/0-fool/VulnbyCola/blob/main/Tenda/AX-3/2/1.md (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Nov 2025, 02:39 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-121

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats