CVE-2025-6364VulnerabilityPublished 20 Jun 2025Updated 23 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6364: code-projects Simple Pizza Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects code-projects Simple Pizza Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 41% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Simple Pizza Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate upgrade or patching: Organizations should check for any official patches or updates from code-projects addressing this vulnerability. If none are available, consider upgrading to a newer, secure version or alternative software. 2. Input validation and parameterized queries: Modify the /adduser-exec.php code to implement strict input validation on the 'Username' parameter and use prepared statements or parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection. 3. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy or update WAF rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 4. Network segmentation: Isolate the ordering system from critical internal networks to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 5. Monitoring and logging: Enable detailed logging of database queries and web requests to detect suspicious activities indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Incident response readiness: Prepare for potential incidents by having response plans and backups to restore affected systems quickly. 7. Vendor engagement: Engage with the software vendor or community to encourage timely release of patches and security advisories. 8. User awareness: Educate staff on the risks of using outdated software and the importance of timely updates.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Simple Pizza Ordering System 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /adduser-exec.php. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely.

Impact

For European organizations using the Simple Pizza Ordering System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to customer data confidentiality and system integrity. Attackers could extract personally identifiable information (PII), payment details, or order histories, leading to privacy violations and regulatory non-compliance under GDPR. Integrity impacts include unauthorized modification of orders or user accounts, potentially disrupting business processes and damaging customer trust. Availability could be affected if attackers execute commands that corrupt or lock database tables, causing service outages. Given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit, attackers can operate from anywhere, increasing the threat surface. Small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the food service sector, which often rely on off-the-shelf or open-source ordering systems, are particularly vulnerable. The reputational damage and potential fines from data breaches could be substantial. Additionally, attackers could use compromised systems as footholds for further network intrusion or lateral movement within organizational IT infrastructure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 21 Jun 2025, 12:52 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats