CVE-2025-64354: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Matias Ventura Gutenberg
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Matias Ventura Gutenberg gutenberg allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Gutenberg: from n/a through <= 21.8.2.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-64354 is a stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in the Gutenberg editor, a widely used block editor for WordPress developed by Matias Ventura. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of input during the generation of web pages, which allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts that are stored persistently within the content managed by Gutenberg. When other users view the compromised content, the malicious script executes in their browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions performed with the victim's privileges. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 21.8.2. According to the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L), the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires privileges (likely editor or contributor roles) and user interaction (such as viewing the malicious content). The scope is changed, meaning the vulnerability can affect components beyond the initially vulnerable one. The impact includes limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability losses. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no official patches were linked at the time of disclosure, indicating the need for vigilance and prompt patching once available. The vulnerability is significant due to Gutenberg's widespread use in WordPress sites globally, including Europe, where many organizations rely on WordPress for content management and digital presence.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-64354 can be substantial, particularly for those heavily reliant on WordPress and the Gutenberg editor for website content management. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized script execution in users’ browsers, enabling attackers to steal session cookies, impersonate users, deface websites, or inject further malicious payloads such as ransomware or phishing content. This can result in reputational damage, data breaches involving personal or sensitive information, and potential regulatory non-compliance under GDPR if personal data is compromised. The medium severity rating reflects the need for privileges and user interaction, which somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with many users having editing rights. The scope change indicates that the vulnerability could affect other components or users beyond the initial target, increasing the potential damage. Given the prevalence of WordPress in European public and private sectors, including media, e-commerce, and government websites, the threat could disrupt services and erode trust in digital platforms.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor official channels for patches or updates from the Gutenberg development team and apply them immediately upon release. 2. Until patches are available, restrict editing privileges to trusted users only, minimizing the risk of malicious input. 3. Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-generated content to prevent injection of malicious scripts. 4. Deploy Content Security Policies (CSP) to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on web application vulnerabilities, including XSS. 6. Educate content editors and administrators about the risks of XSS and safe content handling practices. 7. Use Web Application Firewalls (WAF) with rules designed to detect and block XSS payloads targeting Gutenberg or WordPress. 8. Monitor logs and user activity for unusual behavior that may indicate exploitation attempts. 9. Consider isolating critical administrative interfaces and enforcing multi-factor authentication to reduce the impact of compromised sessions. 10. Backup website data regularly to enable quick restoration in case of defacement or data corruption.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-64354: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Matias Ventura Gutenberg
Description
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Matias Ventura Gutenberg gutenberg allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Gutenberg: from n/a through <= 21.8.2.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-64354 is a stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in the Gutenberg editor, a widely used block editor for WordPress developed by Matias Ventura. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of input during the generation of web pages, which allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts that are stored persistently within the content managed by Gutenberg. When other users view the compromised content, the malicious script executes in their browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions performed with the victim's privileges. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 21.8.2. According to the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L), the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires privileges (likely editor or contributor roles) and user interaction (such as viewing the malicious content). The scope is changed, meaning the vulnerability can affect components beyond the initially vulnerable one. The impact includes limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability losses. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no official patches were linked at the time of disclosure, indicating the need for vigilance and prompt patching once available. The vulnerability is significant due to Gutenberg's widespread use in WordPress sites globally, including Europe, where many organizations rely on WordPress for content management and digital presence.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-64354 can be substantial, particularly for those heavily reliant on WordPress and the Gutenberg editor for website content management. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized script execution in users’ browsers, enabling attackers to steal session cookies, impersonate users, deface websites, or inject further malicious payloads such as ransomware or phishing content. This can result in reputational damage, data breaches involving personal or sensitive information, and potential regulatory non-compliance under GDPR if personal data is compromised. The medium severity rating reflects the need for privileges and user interaction, which somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with many users having editing rights. The scope change indicates that the vulnerability could affect other components or users beyond the initial target, increasing the potential damage. Given the prevalence of WordPress in European public and private sectors, including media, e-commerce, and government websites, the threat could disrupt services and erode trust in digital platforms.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor official channels for patches or updates from the Gutenberg development team and apply them immediately upon release. 2. Until patches are available, restrict editing privileges to trusted users only, minimizing the risk of malicious input. 3. Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-generated content to prevent injection of malicious scripts. 4. Deploy Content Security Policies (CSP) to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on web application vulnerabilities, including XSS. 6. Educate content editors and administrators about the risks of XSS and safe content handling practices. 7. Use Web Application Firewalls (WAF) with rules designed to detect and block XSS payloads targeting Gutenberg or WordPress. 8. Monitor logs and user activity for unusual behavior that may indicate exploitation attempts. 9. Consider isolating critical administrative interfaces and enforcing multi-factor authentication to reduce the impact of compromised sessions. 10. Backup website data regularly to enable quick restoration in case of defacement or data corruption.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-31T11:23:06.889Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6904a34e479ed964d8ea1e94
Added to database: 10/31/2025, 11:53:50 AM
Last enriched: 11/13/2025, 1:09:03 PM
Last updated: 12/12/2025, 5:26:30 AM
Views: 62
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Abusing DLLs EntryPoint for the Fun, (Fri, Dec 12th)
MediumCVE-2025-14467: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in wpjobportal WP Job Portal – AI-Powered Recruitment System for Company or Job Board website
MediumCVE-2025-14393: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in awanhrp Wpik WordPress Basic Ajax Form
MediumCVE-2025-14392: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in darendev Simple Theme Changer
MediumCVE-2025-14391: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in darendev Simple Theme Changer
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.