VulnerabilityPublished 19 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-65022: portabilis i-educar · SQL Injection

Affects portabilis i-educarSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.2 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.2High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubportabilis/i-educar`pkg:github/portabilis/i-educar`Other threats	Affected <=2.10.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediately apply the official patch or update to i-educar that addresses CVE-2025-65022 (commit b473f92).
Implement strict input validation and parameterized queries for all user-supplied data, especially the cod_agenda parameter, to prevent SQL injection.
Restrict user privileges to the minimum necessary, limiting access to sensitive functions and data within the application.
Monitor authenticated sessions for unusual activity that may indicate exploitation attempts.
Conduct regular security audits and code reviews focusing on input handling and database interactions.
Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules tuned to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting i-educar.
Educate administrators and users on secure authentication practices to reduce the risk of credential compromise.
Maintain up-to-date backups of the database to enable recovery in case of data integrity or availability incidents.

Description

CVE-2025-65022 is a high-severity SQL injection vulnerability affecting portabilis i-educar versions 2.10.0 and earlier. It allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the cod_agenda parameter in the ieducar/intranet/agenda.php script due to improper input sanitization. Exploitation requires an authenticated session but no user interaction beyond that. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application’s database. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the vulnerability has been patched in a recent commit. European educational institutions using i-educar are at risk, especially in countries with higher adoption of this software. Mitigation involves applying the patch, restricting authenticated user privileges, and implementing strict input validation.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly educational institutions using i-educar, this vulnerability could lead to severe consequences including unauthorized disclosure of sensitive student and staff data, alteration or deletion of critical records, and potential disruption of school management operations. The compromise of confidentiality could expose personal identifiable information (PII), violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, leading to legal and financial penalties. Integrity breaches could undermine trust in the system’s data accuracy, affecting administrative decisions and reporting. Availability impacts could disrupt educational services, causing operational downtime. Given the authenticated nature of the exploit, insider threats or compromised user accounts pose a significant risk. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high CVSS score underscores the urgency for patching to prevent potential targeted attacks in the European education sector.

Summary

CVE-2025-65022 is an authenticated time-based SQL injection vulnerability identified in the portabilis i-educar school management software, specifically in versions 2.10.0 and earlier. The vulnerability resides in the ieducar/intranet/agenda.php script, where the cod_agenda request parameter is concatenated directly into SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterization. This improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-89) allows an attacker with an authenticated session to inject arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion. The vulnerability does not require user interaction beyond authentication, and the attack vector is network-based with low complexity due to the lack of additional barriers. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates that while privileges are required, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is high. The issue has been addressed in a patch (commit b473f92), which corrects the input handling to prevent SQL injection. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations relying on i-educar for school management.

CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #2OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
XML External Entity Prevention (opens in a new tab)
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering (opens in a new tab)
Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Nov 2025, 17:14 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-89

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats