CVE-2025-65090VulnerabilityPublished 10 Jan 2026Updated 12 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-65090: xwiki-contrib macro-fullcalendar · Information Exposure

Affects xwiki-contrib macro-fullcalendarSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 2.4.6 when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.4.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade macro-fullcalendar and xwiki-contrib/macro-fullcalendar to 2.4.6.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
xwiki-contribmacro-fullcalendar	Affected <2.4.6	Fixed in 2.4.6
GitHubxwiki-contrib/macro-fullcalendar`pkg:github/xwiki-contrib/macro-fullcalendar`Other threats	Affected <2.4.6	Fixed in 2.4.6

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately upgrade the xwiki-contrib macro-fullcalendar component to version 2.4.6 or later to apply the official patch that restricts unauthorized access to the Calendar.JSONService page. Until the upgrade is possible, administrators should review and tighten access controls on the Calendar.JSONService endpoint, ensuring that only authorized users can view calendar data. Implement network-level restrictions such as IP whitelisting or VPN access for sensitive wiki services. Conduct audits of wiki permissions to minimize guest or anonymous user rights. Monitor access logs for unusual or unauthorized requests to the Calendar.JSONService page. Additionally, organizations should review the data stored in the wiki for sensitive information exposure and consider encrypting sensitive content where feasible. Regular vulnerability scanning and patch management processes should be enforced to prevent similar issues.

Description

XWiki Full Calendar Macro displays objects from the wiki on the calendar. Prior to version 2.4.6, users with the rights to view the Calendar.JSONService page (including guest users) can exploit the data leak vulnerability by accessing database info, with the exception of passwords. This issue has been patched in version 2.4.6.

Impact

For European organizations, the exposure of sensitive information through this vulnerability can lead to unauthorized disclosure of internal data, potentially including business-critical or personal information stored within the wiki. Although passwords are not exposed, other confidential data leakage can facilitate further attacks such as social engineering, reconnaissance for targeted attacks, or compliance violations under GDPR if personal data is involved. Organizations in sectors such as government, finance, healthcare, and education that rely on XWiki for collaboration and documentation are particularly at risk. The ease of exploitation without authentication increases the threat level, especially for publicly accessible wiki instances. Data leakage incidents can damage organizational reputation, lead to regulatory penalties, and increase the attack surface for subsequent intrusions. The lack of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future exploitation.

CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #20OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Subverting Environment Variable Values (opens in a new tab)
ICMP Echo Request Ping (opens in a new tab)
TCP SYN Scan (opens in a new tab)
Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) Records (opens in a new tab)
DNS Zone Transfers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Jan 2026, 07:52 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-200

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats