CVE-2025-6525VulnerabilityPublished 23 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6525: 70mai 1S · Improper Authorization

Affects 70mai 1SSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
70mai 1S	Affected =20250611	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should implement network segmentation to isolate 70mai 1S devices from broader corporate networks, restricting access to trusted administrators only. Employ strict access control lists (ACLs) on local network segments to limit which devices can communicate with the dashcams. Monitor network traffic for unusual configuration requests to /cgi-bin/Config.cgi endpoints. Where possible, disable or restrict the CGI interface if not required for normal operation. Use network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) with signatures or behavioral rules to detect exploitation attempts targeting this vulnerability. Since no vendor patch is available, consider deploying compensating controls such as VPN tunnels or secure management VLANs to access the devices remotely, reducing exposure to local network attackers. Regularly audit device configurations and logs for unauthorized changes. Engage with the vendor or consider alternative products with better security track records if the risk is unacceptable. Finally, educate network administrators about the risk and ensure physical security of network segments hosting these devices to prevent unauthorized local access.

Description

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 70mai 1S up to 20250611. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /cgi-bin/Config.cgi?action=set of the component Configuration Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack needs to be approached within the local network. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those deploying 70mai 1S dashcams in fleet management, logistics, or corporate vehicle environments, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized configuration changes that could compromise device integrity and potentially expose sensitive video or telemetry data. The improper authorization could allow attackers to disable security features, redirect data streams, or alter device settings to facilitate further network reconnaissance or lateral movement. While the attack requires local network access, many corporate networks have segments where such devices are connected, increasing the attack surface. The impact on confidentiality is limited but present due to potential exposure of configuration data or video feeds. Integrity impact is moderate as attackers can modify device settings, potentially undermining trust in recorded evidence or device operation. Availability impact is minimal but could occur if configurations disrupt device functionality. Given the vendor’s lack of response and absence of patches, organizations face prolonged exposure. This vulnerability could also be leveraged in targeted attacks against high-value assets using these devices, especially in sectors like transportation, law enforcement, or critical infrastructure where dashcams are used for monitoring and security.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Jun 2025, 21:54 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats