CVE-2025-6528VulnerabilityPublished 23 Jun 2025Updated 26 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6528: 70mai M300 · Improper Authentication

Affects 70mai M300Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 51% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
70mai M300	Affected =20250611	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Implement strict network segmentation to isolate IoT devices like the 70mai M300 dashcam from critical corporate networks and sensitive data systems.

Restrict local network access to trusted users and devices only, using strong Wi-Fi encryption (WPA3 where possible) and network access control (NAC) solutions.

Monitor local network traffic for unusual RTSP stream requests or unauthorized access attempts to the /livestream/12 endpoint.

Disable or restrict RTSP streaming functionality on the device if it is not essential for operations, or replace the device with models that enforce proper authentication.

Use VPNs or secure tunnels for remote access to local networks to prevent unauthorized local network access by external attackers.

Regularly audit and inventory IoT devices in the environment to identify vulnerable models and plan for timely replacement or mitigation.

Engage with the vendor or community for updates or unofficial patches, and consider applying network-level filtering rules to block suspicious RTSP traffic.

Educate staff about the risks of connecting unknown devices to corporate networks and enforce policies to prevent unauthorized device usage.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in 70mai M300 up to 20250611 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /livestream/12 of the component RTSP Live Video Stream Endpoint. The manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack needs to be done within the local network. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-6528 is the potential exposure of sensitive visual data captured by 70mai M300 dashcams. Organizations using these devices in fleet management, logistics, or security monitoring could face confidentiality breaches if attackers gain unauthorized access to live streams. This could lead to leakage of sensitive operational details, employee movements, or other private information. The vulnerability could also be exploited in insider threat scenarios or by attackers who gain access to corporate Wi-Fi networks. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the privacy implications and potential for espionage or surveillance are significant. Additionally, organizations may face regulatory compliance issues under GDPR if personal data is exposed due to inadequate device security. The lack of vendor response and patch availability increases the risk window for affected organizations. However, the requirement for local network access somewhat limits the attack surface, making it less likely to be exploited remotely but still a concern in environments with weak network segmentation or guest network controls.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Jun 2025, 22:55 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats