VulnerabilityPublished 24 Jun 2025Updated 25 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6532: NOYAFA LF9 Pro · Improper Access Controls

Affects NOYAFA LF9 ProSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 43% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
NOYAFA LF9 Pro	Affected =20250611	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the lack of official patches, European organizations should implement network segmentation to isolate dashcams from general corporate networks, restricting access to trusted devices only. Deploy VLANs or dedicated subnets for IoT and vehicle devices, enforcing strict firewall rules to block unauthorized local network access to RTSP endpoints. Regularly audit network traffic for unusual RTSP connection attempts. Where possible, disable RTSP streaming if not required or replace devices with models that have verified secure access controls. Additionally, enforce strong Wi-Fi security protocols (WPA3 preferred) to prevent unauthorized local network access. Organizations should engage with NOYAFA or resellers to obtain firmware updates or security advisories. Finally, educate staff about the risks of connecting unknown devices to internal networks and monitor for insider threats that could exploit local network access.

Description

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in NOYAFA/Xiami LF9 Pro up to 20250611. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component RTSP Live Video Stream Endpoint. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack can only be initiated within the local network. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This dashcam is distributed by multiple resellers and different names.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily related to privacy and confidentiality risks. Dashcams like the NOYAFA LF9 Pro are often used in fleet management, logistics, transportation services, and by private individuals. Unauthorized access to live video streams could lead to exposure of sensitive operational details, vehicle locations, or personal data, potentially violating GDPR regulations. While the vulnerability does not affect system integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach could be exploited for corporate espionage, stalking, or other malicious activities. The local network attack vector limits the threat to environments where the attacker has physical or network proximity, such as compromised internal networks, guest Wi-Fi, or insider threats. Organizations with large vehicle fleets or those relying on these dashcams for security and monitoring should be particularly cautious, as attackers could leverage this vulnerability to gain unauthorized surveillance capabilities.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…