CVE-2025-65829: n/a
The ESP32 system on a chip (SoC) that powers the Meatmeet basestation device was found to lack Secure Boot. The Secure Boot feature ensures that only authenticated software can execute on the device. The Secure Boot process forms a chain of trust by verifying all mutable software entities involved in the Application Startup Flow. As a result, an attacker with physical access to the device can flash modified firmware to the device, resulting in the execution of malicious code upon startup.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-65829 concerns the ESP32 system on a chip (SoC) embedded in Meatmeet basestation devices, which lacks the Secure Boot feature. Secure Boot is a security mechanism that ensures only authenticated and trusted firmware is executed during the device's startup process by establishing a chain of trust that verifies all mutable software components. The absence of Secure Boot means that an attacker who gains physical access to the device can flash modified or malicious firmware onto the ESP32 chip. This malicious firmware will then execute upon device startup, potentially allowing the attacker to fully compromise the device's functionality, manipulate data, or use the device as a foothold into broader network environments. The vulnerability does not require remote exploitation or user interaction but depends on physical access, which is a significant limitation but still critical in many operational contexts. No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild. The vulnerability highlights a fundamental security design oversight in the Meatmeet basestation device's firmware protection, emphasizing the importance of hardware-rooted security features in IoT and embedded systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk particularly in sectors where Meatmeet basestation devices or ESP32-based IoT devices are deployed in physically accessible locations, such as manufacturing, logistics, smart buildings, and critical infrastructure. An attacker with physical access could install malicious firmware, leading to device takeover, data theft, disruption of services, or use of the compromised device as a pivot point for lateral movement within the network. This could result in operational downtime, loss of sensitive information, and potential safety hazards if the devices control physical processes. The impact is amplified in environments with limited physical security or where devices are deployed in public or semi-public spaces. Additionally, compromised devices could undermine trust in IoT deployments and cause regulatory compliance issues under frameworks like GDPR if personal data is affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should: 1) Implement hardware or firmware updates that enable Secure Boot on ESP32 devices if available from the vendor or consider replacing affected devices with models supporting Secure Boot. 2) Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices, including locked enclosures, surveillance, and access logging. 3) Employ tamper detection mechanisms and monitor device integrity regularly to detect unauthorized firmware changes. 4) Segment networks to limit the impact of compromised devices and restrict their communication to only necessary endpoints. 5) Work with Meatmeet and ESP32 vendors to obtain patches or firmware updates that address this security gap. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on physical security and device firmware integrity. 7) Educate staff about the risks of physical tampering and establish incident response procedures for suspected device compromise.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-65829: n/a
Description
The ESP32 system on a chip (SoC) that powers the Meatmeet basestation device was found to lack Secure Boot. The Secure Boot feature ensures that only authenticated software can execute on the device. The Secure Boot process forms a chain of trust by verifying all mutable software entities involved in the Application Startup Flow. As a result, an attacker with physical access to the device can flash modified firmware to the device, resulting in the execution of malicious code upon startup.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-65829 concerns the ESP32 system on a chip (SoC) embedded in Meatmeet basestation devices, which lacks the Secure Boot feature. Secure Boot is a security mechanism that ensures only authenticated and trusted firmware is executed during the device's startup process by establishing a chain of trust that verifies all mutable software components. The absence of Secure Boot means that an attacker who gains physical access to the device can flash modified or malicious firmware onto the ESP32 chip. This malicious firmware will then execute upon device startup, potentially allowing the attacker to fully compromise the device's functionality, manipulate data, or use the device as a foothold into broader network environments. The vulnerability does not require remote exploitation or user interaction but depends on physical access, which is a significant limitation but still critical in many operational contexts. No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild. The vulnerability highlights a fundamental security design oversight in the Meatmeet basestation device's firmware protection, emphasizing the importance of hardware-rooted security features in IoT and embedded systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk particularly in sectors where Meatmeet basestation devices or ESP32-based IoT devices are deployed in physically accessible locations, such as manufacturing, logistics, smart buildings, and critical infrastructure. An attacker with physical access could install malicious firmware, leading to device takeover, data theft, disruption of services, or use of the compromised device as a pivot point for lateral movement within the network. This could result in operational downtime, loss of sensitive information, and potential safety hazards if the devices control physical processes. The impact is amplified in environments with limited physical security or where devices are deployed in public or semi-public spaces. Additionally, compromised devices could undermine trust in IoT deployments and cause regulatory compliance issues under frameworks like GDPR if personal data is affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should: 1) Implement hardware or firmware updates that enable Secure Boot on ESP32 devices if available from the vendor or consider replacing affected devices with models supporting Secure Boot. 2) Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices, including locked enclosures, surveillance, and access logging. 3) Employ tamper detection mechanisms and monitor device integrity regularly to detect unauthorized firmware changes. 4) Segment networks to limit the impact of compromised devices and restrict their communication to only necessary endpoints. 5) Work with Meatmeet and ESP32 vendors to obtain patches or firmware updates that address this security gap. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on physical security and device firmware integrity. 7) Educate staff about the risks of physical tampering and establish incident response procedures for suspected device compromise.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6939e076a97935729e7b8061
Added to database: 12/10/2025, 9:04:54 PM
Last enriched: 12/10/2025, 9:12:21 PM
Last updated: 12/11/2025, 3:52:35 AM
Views: 7
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9436: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in trustindex Widgets for Google Reviews
MediumCVE-2025-10163: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in fernandobt List category posts
MediumCVE-2025-14485: Command Injection in EFM ipTIME A3004T
LowCVE-2025-13764: CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management in ApusTheme WP CarDealer
CriticalCVE-2025-11467: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in themeisle RSS Aggregator by Feedzy – Feed to Post, Autoblogging, News & YouTube Video Feeds Aggregator
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.