CVE-2025-6599VulnerabilityPublished 18 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-6599: Zyxel DX3301-T0 firmware · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affects Zyxel DX3301-T0 firmwareSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Restrict access to the Zyxel DX3301-T0 web management interface using network segmentation and firewall rules, allowing only trusted IP addresses or management VLANs to connect. 2. Implement rate limiting and connection throttling at the network perimeter or on the device itself if supported, to mitigate Slowloris-style attacks. 3. Monitor network traffic for unusual patterns indicative of slow HTTP connection attacks targeting the management interface. 4. Disable the web management interface if not required or use alternative secure management methods such as SSH or dedicated management networks. 5. Regularly update firmware once Zyxel releases a patch addressing this vulnerability. 6. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) capable of detecting and blocking Slowloris or similar DoS attack signatures. 7. Maintain an incident response plan that includes procedures for handling management interface outages. 8. Engage with Zyxel support for any available workarounds or beta patches. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on network-level controls and operational practices tailored to the specific nature of the vulnerability.

Description

An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the web server of Zyxel DX3301-T0 firmware version 5.50(ABVY.6.3)C0 and earlier could allow an attacker to perform Slowloris‑style denial‑of‑service (DoS) attacks. Such attacks may temporarily block legitimate HTTP requests and partially disrupt access to the web management interface, while other networking services remain unaffected.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-6599 is the potential disruption of network device management due to denial-of-service attacks targeting the web management interface of Zyxel DX3301-T0 devices. This can hinder timely configuration changes, monitoring, and incident response activities, potentially delaying remediation of other security issues. While core network services remain unaffected, the inability to access the management interface could increase operational risk and reduce network resilience. Organizations relying heavily on these devices for critical infrastructure or large-scale network deployments may face increased downtime or administrative overhead. The attack does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity but impacts availability of management functions, which could indirectly affect overall security posture. Given the lack of known exploits in the wild, the immediate risk is moderate, but the ease of exploitation and remote attack vector warrant proactive mitigation.

CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: High
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place.
Architecture and Design
Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or; uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.1.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XML Ping of the Death (opens in a new tab)
Regular Expression Exponential Blowup (opens in a new tab)
Sustained Client Engagement (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-uncontrolled-resource-consumption-and-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-certain-4g-lte-5g-nr-cpe-dsl-ethernet-cpe-fiber-onts-security-routers-and-wireless-extenders-11-18-2025 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 25 Nov 2025, 04:48 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-400

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats