VulnerabilityPublished 8 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-66325: Huawei HarmonyOS · Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls

Affects Huawei HarmonyOSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.2 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.2Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.09% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Huawei HarmonyOS	Affected 2.0.0 – 4.3.1 7 affected builds	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should implement strict local access controls on Huawei HarmonyOS devices, including enforcing strong authentication and limiting user privileges to trusted personnel only. Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to monitor for unusual local activities related to package management operations. Network segmentation and device hardening can reduce the likelihood of unauthorized local access. Organizations should maintain an inventory of devices running affected HarmonyOS versions and prioritize them for monitoring and eventual patching. Since no patches are currently available, coordinate with Huawei for timely updates and apply them promptly once released. Additionally, consider disabling or restricting package management functionalities where feasible to limit attack vectors. Conduct security awareness training to mitigate insider threats and physical access risks. Finally, integrate this vulnerability into risk assessments and incident response plans to ensure preparedness.

Description

Permission control vulnerability in the package management module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a confidentiality risk primarily in environments where Huawei HarmonyOS devices are deployed, such as mobile devices, IoT endpoints, or embedded systems. Sensitive service data could be exposed to unauthorized local users or malicious processes, potentially leading to information leakage or aiding further attacks. Sectors like telecommunications, government, and critical infrastructure using Huawei devices may face increased risk due to the strategic importance of their data. Although the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability, confidentiality breaches can undermine trust, violate data protection regulations such as GDPR, and cause reputational damage. The requirement for local access limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk in scenarios involving insider threats, compromised endpoints, or physical access. The absence of known exploits suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before active exploitation emerges.

CWE-264Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls (opens in a new tab)
CategoryOWASP Top 10 A01:2021: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Weaknesses in this category are related to the management of permissions, privileges, and other security features that are used to perform access control.
MITRE does not allow mapping vulnerabilities to this entry; it groups weaknesses rather than naming one.

References

consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/12/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Dec 2025, 08:59 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-264

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats