CVE-2025-66404: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-66404 affects the exec_in_pod tool within Flux159's mcp-server-kubernetes product versions prior to 2.9.8. This tool is designed to execute commands inside Kubernetes pods. When commands are provided in string format, they are passed directly to the shell (sh -c) without any sanitization or input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-77) enables command injection attacks. An attacker with authenticated access and the ability to provide input to exec_in_pod can execute arbitrary shell commands within the Kubernetes environment. The vulnerability also opens the door for indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents interacting with the system might inadvertently execute malicious commands without explicit user intent. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.4 reflects a medium severity, considering the network attack vector, high complexity, required privileges, and user interaction. The impact includes potential full compromise of the Kubernetes cluster's managed pods, leading to confidentiality breaches, data integrity loss, and service disruption. The issue is resolved in version 2.9.8 of the product.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to Kubernetes-managed environments, especially those relying on Flux159's mcp-server-kubernetes for cluster management. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution within pods, potentially compromising sensitive data, disrupting critical services, or enabling lateral movement within the network. Given the widespread adoption of Kubernetes in European enterprises and public sector organizations, the impact could extend to cloud infrastructure, containerized applications, and DevOps pipelines. The requirement for authenticated access and user interaction somewhat limits the attack surface but does not eliminate the risk, particularly in environments where multiple users or automated agents interact with the exec_in_pod tool. The possibility of indirect prompt injection via AI agents further complicates defense strategies. Operational disruptions and data breaches resulting from this vulnerability could have regulatory and reputational consequences under GDPR and other European data protection frameworks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes to version 2.9.8 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until patching is complete, restrict access to the exec_in_pod functionality to the minimum necessary set of trusted users and service accounts. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on any user-supplied commands before they reach the exec_in_pod tool, especially when commands are provided in string format. Monitor and audit usage of exec_in_pod for unusual or unauthorized command executions. Employ network segmentation and role-based access controls to limit exposure of Kubernetes management interfaces. Additionally, review and secure AI agent integrations to prevent indirect prompt injection attacks by enforcing strict command whitelisting and contextual validation. Incorporate runtime security tools that detect anomalous container or pod behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. Finally, maintain up-to-date incident response plans tailored to container and Kubernetes environments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy
CVE-2025-66404: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-66404 affects the exec_in_pod tool within Flux159's mcp-server-kubernetes product versions prior to 2.9.8. This tool is designed to execute commands inside Kubernetes pods. When commands are provided in string format, they are passed directly to the shell (sh -c) without any sanitization or input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-77) enables command injection attacks. An attacker with authenticated access and the ability to provide input to exec_in_pod can execute arbitrary shell commands within the Kubernetes environment. The vulnerability also opens the door for indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents interacting with the system might inadvertently execute malicious commands without explicit user intent. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.4 reflects a medium severity, considering the network attack vector, high complexity, required privileges, and user interaction. The impact includes potential full compromise of the Kubernetes cluster's managed pods, leading to confidentiality breaches, data integrity loss, and service disruption. The issue is resolved in version 2.9.8 of the product.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to Kubernetes-managed environments, especially those relying on Flux159's mcp-server-kubernetes for cluster management. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution within pods, potentially compromising sensitive data, disrupting critical services, or enabling lateral movement within the network. Given the widespread adoption of Kubernetes in European enterprises and public sector organizations, the impact could extend to cloud infrastructure, containerized applications, and DevOps pipelines. The requirement for authenticated access and user interaction somewhat limits the attack surface but does not eliminate the risk, particularly in environments where multiple users or automated agents interact with the exec_in_pod tool. The possibility of indirect prompt injection via AI agents further complicates defense strategies. Operational disruptions and data breaches resulting from this vulnerability could have regulatory and reputational consequences under GDPR and other European data protection frameworks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes to version 2.9.8 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Until patching is complete, restrict access to the exec_in_pod functionality to the minimum necessary set of trusted users and service accounts. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on any user-supplied commands before they reach the exec_in_pod tool, especially when commands are provided in string format. Monitor and audit usage of exec_in_pod for unusual or unauthorized command executions. Employ network segmentation and role-based access controls to limit exposure of Kubernetes management interfaces. Additionally, review and secure AI agent integrations to prevent indirect prompt injection attacks by enforcing strict command whitelisting and contextual validation. Incorporate runtime security tools that detect anomalous container or pod behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. Finally, maintain up-to-date incident response plans tailored to container and Kubernetes environments.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-11-28T23:33:56.365Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6930a178e580ff243da31211
Added to database: 12/3/2025, 8:45:44 PM
Last enriched: 12/3/2025, 9:00:55 PM
Last updated: 12/4/2025, 1:37:32 AM
Views: 25
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-62173: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in FreePBX security-reporting
HighCVE-2025-64055: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-66293: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read in pnggroup libpng
HighCVE-2025-65868: n/a
UnknownCVE-2023-0842: Prototype Pollution in xml2js
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.