VulnerabilityPublished 5 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-66556: nextcloud security-advisories · Insecure Direct Object Reference

Affects nextcloud security-advisoriesSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.5 Low : upgrade to 20.1.8 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

3.5Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 16% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 20.1.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade nextcloud/spreed to 20.1.8.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubnextcloud/spreed`pkg:github/nextcloud/spreed`Other threats	Affected <20.1.8	Fixed in 20.1.8

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately upgrade Nextcloud Talk to versions 20.1.8 or 21.1.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Administrators should audit user permissions to ensure that only trusted users have chat permissions, minimizing the risk of insider misuse. Implement monitoring and logging of poll draft deletion activities to detect unusual or unauthorized actions. Consider restricting poll draft deletion capabilities to higher privilege roles if feasible. Regularly review and update Nextcloud and its apps to the latest stable releases to benefit from security patches. Additionally, educate users about the importance of reporting unexpected changes in collaborative content. Employ network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of Nextcloud services to only necessary users and networks. Finally, maintain an incident response plan to address any detected misuse promptly.

Description

Nextcloud talk is a video & audio conferencing app for Nextcloud. Prior to 20.1.8 and 21.1.2, a participant with chat permissions was able to delete poll drafts of other participants within the conversation based on their numeric ID. This vulnerability is fixed in 20.1.8 and 21.1.2.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential unauthorized modification of collaborative content within Nextcloud Talk conversations. This could undermine trust in meeting artifacts, disrupt decision-making processes, or cause confusion if poll drafts are deleted without authorization. While the confidentiality and availability of communications remain unaffected, the integrity of collaborative data is compromised. Organizations relying heavily on Nextcloud Talk for internal communications and decision-making may face operational inefficiencies or reputational damage if such unauthorized actions occur. Given the low CVSS score and the need for chat permissions, the risk is moderate but should not be ignored, especially in regulated sectors where data integrity is critical. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but patching is essential to prevent future exploitation.

CWE-639Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #24OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
Architecture and Design
For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design
Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V4.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 5 Dec 2025, 18:30 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-639

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats