CVE-2025-69224: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in aio-libs aiohttp
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below of the Python HTTP parser may allow a request smuggling attack with the presence of non-ASCII characters. If a pure Python version of AIOHTTP is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-69224 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests), commonly known as HTTP request smuggling, affecting the aiohttp Python framework versions below 3.13.3. aiohttp is widely used for asynchronous HTTP client and server implementations in Python applications. The vulnerability specifically manifests when aiohttp is installed without its C extensions or when the environment variable AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is set, causing the framework to rely on a pure Python HTTP parser. This parser incorrectly handles HTTP requests containing non-ASCII characters, leading to inconsistent interpretation between front-end proxies or firewalls and the backend aiohttp server. An attacker can exploit this discrepancy to smuggle HTTP requests, effectively bypassing security controls such as firewalls or reverse proxies. This can allow unauthorized request injection, session hijacking, or cache poisoning. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and the attack vector is network-based, making it remotely exploitable. The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.3 (medium severity), reflecting the moderate impact on confidentiality and integrity with low attack complexity. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet. The issue was addressed in aiohttp version 3.13.3 by correcting the HTTP parsing logic to handle non-ASCII characters consistently and ensuring the C extensions are used or the pure Python parser is hardened. Organizations using aiohttp in web-facing applications or APIs should assess their deployment configurations, especially if they disable C extensions or rely on pure Python builds.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to web applications and services built using aiohttp, particularly those deployed in environments where C extensions are disabled or unavailable, such as certain containerized or restricted runtime environments. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass perimeter security controls like firewalls and proxies, leading to unauthorized access, data leakage, or manipulation of HTTP requests and responses. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and disrupt normal service operations. Sectors with high reliance on Python-based asynchronous web services, including financial services, healthcare, and government digital services, may face increased risk. Additionally, organizations using aiohttp in microservices architectures or API gateways could see lateral movement or privilege escalation attempts facilitated by this vulnerability. Although no active exploits are known, the ease of remote exploitation without authentication or user interaction elevates the threat level. Failure to patch could expose European entities to targeted attacks, especially in the context of increasing cyber espionage and cybercrime activities in the region.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade all aiohttp deployments to version 3.13.3 or later immediately to apply the official fix. 2. Avoid disabling C extensions in aiohttp installations; ensure that the environment variable AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is not set unless absolutely necessary. 3. Conduct an inventory of all Python applications using aiohttp, focusing on those exposed to external networks or handling sensitive data. 4. Implement strict input validation and sanitization for HTTP headers and request payloads to detect and block malformed or suspicious requests containing non-ASCII characters. 5. Enhance monitoring and logging of HTTP traffic at the application and network perimeter to identify anomalies indicative of request smuggling attempts. 6. Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with updated signatures capable of detecting HTTP request smuggling patterns. 7. Review proxy and firewall configurations to ensure consistent HTTP parsing and reject ambiguous or conflicting requests. 8. Educate development and operations teams about the risks of disabling aiohttp C extensions and the importance of timely patching. 9. Test applications in staging environments with the updated aiohttp version to verify compatibility and stability before production rollout.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-69224: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in aio-libs aiohttp
Description
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below of the Python HTTP parser may allow a request smuggling attack with the presence of non-ASCII characters. If a pure Python version of AIOHTTP is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-69224 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests), commonly known as HTTP request smuggling, affecting the aiohttp Python framework versions below 3.13.3. aiohttp is widely used for asynchronous HTTP client and server implementations in Python applications. The vulnerability specifically manifests when aiohttp is installed without its C extensions or when the environment variable AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is set, causing the framework to rely on a pure Python HTTP parser. This parser incorrectly handles HTTP requests containing non-ASCII characters, leading to inconsistent interpretation between front-end proxies or firewalls and the backend aiohttp server. An attacker can exploit this discrepancy to smuggle HTTP requests, effectively bypassing security controls such as firewalls or reverse proxies. This can allow unauthorized request injection, session hijacking, or cache poisoning. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and the attack vector is network-based, making it remotely exploitable. The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.3 (medium severity), reflecting the moderate impact on confidentiality and integrity with low attack complexity. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet. The issue was addressed in aiohttp version 3.13.3 by correcting the HTTP parsing logic to handle non-ASCII characters consistently and ensuring the C extensions are used or the pure Python parser is hardened. Organizations using aiohttp in web-facing applications or APIs should assess their deployment configurations, especially if they disable C extensions or rely on pure Python builds.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to web applications and services built using aiohttp, particularly those deployed in environments where C extensions are disabled or unavailable, such as certain containerized or restricted runtime environments. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass perimeter security controls like firewalls and proxies, leading to unauthorized access, data leakage, or manipulation of HTTP requests and responses. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data and disrupt normal service operations. Sectors with high reliance on Python-based asynchronous web services, including financial services, healthcare, and government digital services, may face increased risk. Additionally, organizations using aiohttp in microservices architectures or API gateways could see lateral movement or privilege escalation attempts facilitated by this vulnerability. Although no active exploits are known, the ease of remote exploitation without authentication or user interaction elevates the threat level. Failure to patch could expose European entities to targeted attacks, especially in the context of increasing cyber espionage and cybercrime activities in the region.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade all aiohttp deployments to version 3.13.3 or later immediately to apply the official fix. 2. Avoid disabling C extensions in aiohttp installations; ensure that the environment variable AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is not set unless absolutely necessary. 3. Conduct an inventory of all Python applications using aiohttp, focusing on those exposed to external networks or handling sensitive data. 4. Implement strict input validation and sanitization for HTTP headers and request payloads to detect and block malformed or suspicious requests containing non-ASCII characters. 5. Enhance monitoring and logging of HTTP traffic at the application and network perimeter to identify anomalies indicative of request smuggling attempts. 6. Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with updated signatures capable of detecting HTTP request smuggling patterns. 7. Review proxy and firewall configurations to ensure consistent HTTP parsing and reject ambiguous or conflicting requests. 8. Educate development and operations teams about the risks of disabling aiohttp C extensions and the importance of timely patching. 9. Test applications in staging environments with the updated aiohttp version to verify compatibility and stability before production rollout.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-29T20:46:13.630Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 695c40c23839e4417595ee5d
Added to database: 1/5/2026, 10:52:50 PM
Last enriched: 1/5/2026, 11:07:13 PM
Last updated: 1/8/2026, 2:15:01 PM
Views: 33
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8307: CWE-257 Storing Passwords in a Recoverable Format in Asseco InfoMedica Plus
MediumCVE-2025-8306: CWE-1220 Insufficient Granularity of Access Control in Asseco InfoMedica Plus
MediumCVE-2025-14025: Incorrect Execution-Assigned Permissions in Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
HighCVE-2026-21891: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in IceWhaleTech ZimaOS
CriticalCVE-2026-21885: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in miniflux v2
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.