Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-69226: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in aio-libs aiohttp

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-69226cvecve-2025-69226cwe-22cwe-200
Published: Mon Jan 05 2026 (01/05/2026, 22:52:38 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: aio-libs
Product: aiohttp

Description

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below enable an attacker to ascertain the existence of absolute path components through the path normalization logic for static files meant to prevent path traversal. If an application uses web.static() (not recommended for production deployments), it may be possible for an attacker to ascertain the existence of path components. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/05/2026, 23:22:11 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-69226 is a path traversal vulnerability classified under CWE-22 and CWE-200 affecting aiohttp, a popular asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for Python's asyncio. Versions 3.13.2 and below contain a flaw in the path normalization logic used for serving static files via the web.static() method. This logic is intended to prevent path traversal attacks by restricting access to files within a designated directory. However, due to improper limitation of pathname components, an attacker can remotely probe and ascertain the existence of absolute path components on the server's filesystem. This information disclosure can aid in further targeted attacks by revealing directory structures or sensitive file locations. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction and can be exploited over the network, increasing its risk profile. The vulnerability is mitigated in aiohttp version 3.13.3, where the path normalization logic has been corrected. While web.static() is not recommended for production use, some applications may still rely on it, thus exposing themselves to this risk. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the medium CVSS score of 6.3 reflects the potential for information leakage that could facilitate subsequent attacks.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability primarily poses a risk of information disclosure, which can compromise confidentiality by revealing filesystem structures and potentially sensitive file locations. This can facilitate further exploitation such as privilege escalation or targeted attacks. Organizations using aiohttp in web applications that serve static content, especially those using the web.static() method in production or staging environments, are vulnerable. The impact is heightened for sectors with sensitive data such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Since the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication, exposed web services are at risk. However, the vulnerability does not directly allow code execution or data modification, limiting its impact on integrity and availability. Nonetheless, the information gained can be leveraged in multi-stage attacks, increasing overall risk. European cloud service providers and SaaS companies using Python-based asynchronous frameworks may also be affected, potentially impacting their customers.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-69226, European organizations should immediately upgrade all aiohttp deployments to version 3.13.3 or later, where the path normalization flaw is fixed. Avoid using the web.static() method in production environments; instead, serve static files through dedicated, secure web servers or CDN solutions that have robust path traversal protections. Conduct thorough code audits to identify any usage of web.static() or similar static file serving mechanisms in Python asyncio applications. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on any user-supplied paths or filenames. Employ network-level protections such as web application firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block suspicious path traversal attempts. Monitor logs for unusual access patterns that may indicate reconnaissance activity targeting static file paths. Additionally, ensure that file system permissions are properly configured to limit access to sensitive directories even if path traversal is attempted. Finally, maintain an up-to-date inventory of Python packages and dependencies to quickly respond to future vulnerabilities.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2025-12-29T20:53:09.411Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 695c44473839e44175970366

Added to database: 1/5/2026, 11:07:51 PM

Last enriched: 1/5/2026, 11:22:11 PM

Last updated: 1/8/2026, 9:51:35 AM

Views: 36

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats