CVE-2025-69649: n/a
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-69649 is a null pointer dereference vulnerability found in the GNU Binutils readelf utility through version 2.46. The vulnerability arises when readelf processes a crafted ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binary containing malformed header fields. Specifically, during the relocation processing phase, an invalid or null section pointer can be passed into the display_relocations() function. This leads to a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) causing the readelf process to terminate abruptly. The root cause is a failure to properly validate section pointers before dereferencing them. Importantly, analysis shows no evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, and no possibility of arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation has been observed. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction since an attacker must convince a user or system to run readelf on a malicious ELF file. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.5 (medium severity), reflecting the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity but a high impact on availability due to process crashes. No patches or fixes have been published at the time of disclosure, and no known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference).
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-69649 is on the availability of the readelf utility, which may crash when processing maliciously crafted ELF binaries. This can disrupt debugging, binary analysis, or automated tooling workflows that rely on readelf, potentially delaying development or security analysis tasks. Since readelf is widely used in Linux and Unix-like environments for inspecting ELF files, the vulnerability could affect developers, security researchers, and automated systems that parse ELF binaries. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or integrity, and no code execution or privilege escalation is possible. The requirement for local access and user interaction limits the attack surface, reducing the risk of remote exploitation. Organizations relying on GNU Binutils in build pipelines, security tools, or forensic analysis should be aware of potential denial-of-service conditions if untrusted ELF files are processed. The absence of known exploits and patches means risk is currently theoretical but should be addressed proactively.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-69649, organizations should: 1) Avoid running readelf on untrusted or unauthenticated ELF binaries, especially those received from unverified sources. 2) Implement strict file validation and sandboxing when analyzing ELF files to limit the impact of potential crashes. 3) Monitor GNU Binutils project communications for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 4) Consider using alternative ELF inspection tools that do not exhibit this vulnerability until a fix is released. 5) Incorporate error handling and process isolation in automated workflows that invoke readelf to prevent a single crash from impacting broader systems. 6) Educate developers and security analysts about the risk of denial-of-service via malformed ELF files and enforce policies to verify binary provenance. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on operational controls and proactive monitoring specific to ELF file handling and readelf usage.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, China, India, United Kingdom, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, Netherlands
CVE-2025-69649: n/a
Description
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed header fields. During relocation processing, an invalid or null section pointer may be passed into display_relocations(), resulting in a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) and abrupt termination. No evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, nor any possibility of code execution, was observed.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-69649 is a null pointer dereference vulnerability found in the GNU Binutils readelf utility through version 2.46. The vulnerability arises when readelf processes a crafted ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binary containing malformed header fields. Specifically, during the relocation processing phase, an invalid or null section pointer can be passed into the display_relocations() function. This leads to a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) causing the readelf process to terminate abruptly. The root cause is a failure to properly validate section pointers before dereferencing them. Importantly, analysis shows no evidence of memory corruption beyond the null pointer dereference, and no possibility of arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation has been observed. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction since an attacker must convince a user or system to run readelf on a malicious ELF file. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.5 (medium severity), reflecting the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity but a high impact on availability due to process crashes. No patches or fixes have been published at the time of disclosure, and no known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference).
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-69649 is on the availability of the readelf utility, which may crash when processing maliciously crafted ELF binaries. This can disrupt debugging, binary analysis, or automated tooling workflows that rely on readelf, potentially delaying development or security analysis tasks. Since readelf is widely used in Linux and Unix-like environments for inspecting ELF files, the vulnerability could affect developers, security researchers, and automated systems that parse ELF binaries. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or integrity, and no code execution or privilege escalation is possible. The requirement for local access and user interaction limits the attack surface, reducing the risk of remote exploitation. Organizations relying on GNU Binutils in build pipelines, security tools, or forensic analysis should be aware of potential denial-of-service conditions if untrusted ELF files are processed. The absence of known exploits and patches means risk is currently theoretical but should be addressed proactively.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-69649, organizations should: 1) Avoid running readelf on untrusted or unauthenticated ELF binaries, especially those received from unverified sources. 2) Implement strict file validation and sandboxing when analyzing ELF files to limit the impact of potential crashes. 3) Monitor GNU Binutils project communications for patches or updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 4) Consider using alternative ELF inspection tools that do not exhibit this vulnerability until a fix is released. 5) Incorporate error handling and process isolation in automated workflows that invoke readelf to prevent a single crash from impacting broader systems. 6) Educate developers and security analysts about the risk of denial-of-service via malformed ELF files and enforce policies to verify binary provenance. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on operational controls and proactive monitoring specific to ELF file handling and readelf usage.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-09T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69ab1d6dc48b3f10ffbeb7ad
Added to database: 3/6/2026, 6:31:09 PM
Last enriched: 3/13/2026, 7:31:07 PM
Last updated: 4/21/2026, 6:16:19 AM
Views: 71
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.