VulnerabilityPublished 15 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-70892: Cyber-Cafe-Management-System-CVEs · CVE-2025-70892 is a critical SQL Injection

Affects Cyber-Cafe-Management-System-CVEsSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.8 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.8Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 38% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubefekaanakkar/Cyber-Cafe-Management-System-CVEs`pkg:github/efekaanakkar/Cyber-Cafe-Management-System-CVEs`Other threats	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately audit their use of Phpgurukul Cyber Cafe Management System v1.0 and isolate affected systems. Specific mitigations include: 1) Implementing strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data, especially the 'username' parameter in add-users.php. 2) Refactoring database queries to use parameterized statements or prepared queries to prevent SQL injection. 3) Applying the principle of least privilege to database accounts used by the application, limiting permissions to only necessary operations. 4) Monitoring logs for suspicious activity related to user management endpoints. 5) If possible, upgrading to a patched or newer version of the software once available. 6) Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with SQL injection detection rules as an interim protective measure. 7) Conducting regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on input validation vulnerabilities. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on code-level remediation and operational controls tailored to the specific vulnerable module.

Description

CVE-2025-70892 is a critical SQL Injection vulnerability in Phpgurukul Cyber Cafe Management System v1.0, specifically in the user management module's add-users.php endpoint. The flaw arises from improper validation of the username parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. This vulnerability has a CVSS score of 9.8, indicating a critical risk with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, exploitation could lead to full database compromise, data leakage, or system disruption. European organizations using this system, especially cyber cafes or small businesses managing user access, are at risk. Mitigation requires immediate input validation, parameterized queries, and restricting database permissions. Countries with higher adoption of cyber cafe management solutions and significant small business sectors, such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the UK, are likely most affected.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-70892 could be severe, especially for small to medium enterprises and cyber cafes relying on the vulnerable management system. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized disclosure of user data, including personally identifiable information, which may violate GDPR and other data protection regulations, resulting in legal and financial penalties. Integrity of user records and billing data can be compromised, leading to fraudulent activities or financial losses. Availability impacts could disrupt business operations, causing downtime and loss of customer trust. Given the critical severity and ease of exploitation without authentication, attackers could remotely compromise systems en masse, potentially leading to widespread data breaches or service outages. The absence of known exploits currently provides a window for mitigation, but the risk of future exploitation remains high.

Summary

CVE-2025-70892 identifies a critical SQL Injection vulnerability in the Phpgurukul Cyber Cafe Management System version 1.0. The vulnerability exists in the user management module, specifically within the add-users.php endpoint, where the application fails to properly sanitize or validate the 'username' parameter supplied by users. This improper input validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious SQL code directly into backend database queries. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command). The CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 reflects the vulnerability's critical nature, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and high impact on confidentiality (C:H), integrity (I:H), and availability (A:H). Exploiting this flaw could enable attackers to extract sensitive data, modify or delete database records, or cause denial of service by corrupting the database. Although no public exploits are currently reported, the vulnerability's characteristics make it highly exploitable. The lack of available patches or mitigations in the provided data indicates that organizations must proactively implement defensive measures. This vulnerability primarily affects installations of Phpgurukul Cyber Cafe Management System v1.0, which is typically used by cyber cafes and small businesses to manage user access and billing.

CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #2OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
XML External Entity Prevention (opens in a new tab)
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering (opens in a new tab)
Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 22 Jan 2026, 21:31 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-89

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats