CVE-2025-7153VulnerabilityPublished 8 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7153: CodeAstro Simple Hospital Management System · Cross Site Scripting

Affects CodeAstro Simple Hospital Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubvanshdhawan188/Simple-Hospital-Management-System-in-Python-CodeAstro-Patients-Stored-XSS-Doctors-Page`pkg:github/vanshdhawan188/Simple-Hospital-Management-System-in-Python-CodeAstro-Patients-Stored-XSS-Doctors-Page`Other threats	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediate implementation of input validation and output encoding: Ensure that all user-supplied input fields (First Name, Last Name, Address) are properly sanitized and encoded before rendering in the HTML context to prevent script injection. 2. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting XSS payloads to provide a temporary protective layer until a patch is available. 3. Conduct user awareness training for hospital staff to recognize suspicious links or inputs that could trigger XSS attacks. 4. Monitor web server and application logs for unusual requests or error patterns indicative of attempted exploitation. 5. Engage with CodeAstro or the vendor community to obtain or request a security patch or updated version addressing this vulnerability. 6. If possible, restrict access to the /doctor.html page to trusted internal networks or authenticated users to reduce exposure. 7. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers accessing the hospital management system. 8. Regularly review and update security controls and conduct penetration testing focused on XSS vulnerabilities to proactively identify and remediate similar issues.

Description

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in CodeAstro Simple Hospital Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /doctor.html of the component POST Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument First Name/Last name/Address leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European healthcare organizations using CodeAstro Simple Hospital Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity and trustworthiness of their web applications. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in the browsers of hospital staff or patients, potentially leading to theft of session tokens, unauthorized actions on behalf of users, or delivery of malware. This can disrupt hospital operations, compromise sensitive patient data indirectly via session hijacking, and damage organizational reputation. Given the critical nature of healthcare services and strict data protection regulations such as GDPR in Europe, even a medium-severity XSS vulnerability can have significant compliance and operational consequences. Additionally, the healthcare sector is a frequent target for cyberattacks, increasing the likelihood that adversaries may attempt to exploit such vulnerabilities. The remote attack vector and lack of required privileges make it easier for attackers to attempt exploitation, especially in environments where user awareness or input validation controls are insufficient.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 00:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats