VulnerabilityPublished 10 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7414: Tenda O3V2 · OS Command Injection

Affects Tenda O3V2Source CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · 12% EPSS · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 12.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 96% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Immediate network segmentation: Isolate Tenda O3V2 devices from critical network segments to limit potential lateral movement if compromised.
Access control: Restrict remote management access to the device's HTTP interface using firewall rules or VPNs, ensuring only trusted IPs can reach the management interface.
Input filtering: If possible, implement web application firewalls (WAFs) or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) that can detect and block command injection patterns targeting the '/goform/setPingInfo' endpoint.
Monitoring and logging: Enable detailed logging on Tenda devices and network perimeter devices to detect suspicious requests or unusual command execution patterns.
Vendor engagement: Contact Tenda support to inquire about patches or firmware updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them as soon as they become available.
Device replacement: For high-risk environments, consider replacing affected devices with alternatives that have a stronger security track record until a patch is released.
User education: Inform network administrators about the vulnerability and the importance of restricting access and monitoring affected devices.

Description

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tenda O3V2 1.0.0.12(3880). This vulnerability affects the function fromNetToolGet of the file /goform/setPingInfo of the component httpd. The manipulation of the argument domain leads to os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using Tenda O3V2 devices, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized remote command execution, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the device. This could lead to partial compromise of device confidentiality, integrity, and availability, such as unauthorized access to network configurations, disruption of network services, or pivoting to internal networks. Given that Tenda devices are often used in small to medium business environments and possibly in home office setups, the impact could extend to critical network infrastructure if these devices serve as gateways or routers. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is serious, it may not lead to full system compromise or widespread disruption without additional factors. However, the public disclosure of the exploit increases the urgency for European organizations to assess their exposure and implement mitigations promptly to prevent potential attacks that could disrupt business operations or leak sensitive information.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Jul 2025, 21:16 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats