CVE-2025-7788VulnerabilityPublished 18 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7788: Xuxueli xxl-job · OS Command Injection

Affects Xuxueli xxl-jobSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 4.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 92% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavencom.xuxueli/xxl-job`pkg:maven/com.xuxueli/xxl-job`Other threats	Affected =3.1.0 =3.1.1	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation steps include restricting network access to the xxl-job executor service to trusted hosts only, using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure. Organizations should monitor logs for suspicious command execution patterns or unexpected job handler invocations. Applying strict input validation and sanitization on job parameters can reduce injection risk, although this requires code changes. Until an official patch is released by Xuxueli, consider upgrading to a non-affected version if available or disabling the vulnerable job handler functionality if feasible. Implementing runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can help detect and block exploitation attempts. Regularly review and audit scheduled jobs for unusual configurations or parameters. Finally, maintain an incident response plan to quickly isolate affected systems if exploitation is suspected.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.1.1 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function commandJobHandler of the file src\main\java\com\xxl\job\executor\service\jobhandler\SampleXxlJob.java. The manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using xxl-job versions 3.1.0 or 3.1.1, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized remote code execution on servers running the job executor. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands, potentially leading to data leakage, service disruption, or further lateral movement within the network. Although the CVSS score indicates medium severity, the lack of required authentication and remote exploitability increases the risk profile. The impact is particularly significant for organizations that use xxl-job to automate critical business processes or handle sensitive data. Disruption or compromise of these scheduled tasks could affect operational continuity and data integrity. Given the public disclosure, there is a risk that attackers may develop exploits, increasing the threat over time. European entities in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, and IT services that rely on Java-based scheduling frameworks should be vigilant. The vulnerability could also be leveraged as an initial foothold in targeted attacks or ransomware campaigns if exploited in combination with other vulnerabilities.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Jul 2025, 15:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats