VulnerabilityPublished 5 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-8552: atjiu pybbs · Cross-site Scripting

Affects atjiu pybbsSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 18% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 5 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
atjiu pybbs	Affected =6.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Apply the official patch identified by commit 2fe4a51afbce0068c291bc1818bbc8f7f3b01a22 immediately to remediate the vulnerability.
Restrict access to the /admin/tag/list interface by implementing network-level controls such as IP whitelisting or VPN access to reduce exposure to the internet.
Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate the impact of potential XSS attacks by restricting the sources of executable scripts.
Conduct user training for administrators to recognize phishing attempts or suspicious links that could trigger XSS payloads.
Regularly audit and monitor logs for unusual activity in the administrative interface to detect potential exploitation attempts early.
Consider deploying web application firewalls (WAF) with rules tailored to detect and block XSS attack patterns targeting the pybbs admin endpoints.
Review and sanitize all user inputs rigorously in custom or extended modules to prevent similar injection vulnerabilities. These steps, combined with patching, will significantly reduce the risk and impact of this vulnerability.

Description

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in atjiu pybbs up to 6.0.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/tag/list. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 2fe4a51afbce0068c291bc1818bbc8f7f3b01a22. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

Impact

For European organizations using atjiu pybbs version 6.0.0 or earlier, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Since the vulnerability affects the administrative interface, exploitation could lead to unauthorized actions performed with administrative privileges, potentially compromising the integrity of the forum or bulletin board system data. This could result in unauthorized content manipulation, user impersonation, or theft of sensitive information such as user credentials or private messages. The impact on confidentiality and integrity, although limited, could affect trust and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Additionally, if the pybbs platform is used in critical communication or collaboration environments, disruption or manipulation could have operational consequences. The remote exploitability increases the attack surface, especially if the administrative interface is exposed or accessible over the internet. However, the requirement for user interaction (e.g., an administrator clicking a malicious link) somewhat limits the ease of exploitation. Overall, European organizations relying on this software should consider this vulnerability a tangible risk that requires prompt remediation to avoid potential data breaches or operational disruptions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 5 Aug 2025, 08:33 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats