CVE-2025-8702VulnerabilityPublished 7 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-8702: Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System · SQL Injection

Affects Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 28% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately audit their deployment of the Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System to identify any instances of version 1.0 in use. Until an official patch is released, it is critical to implement strict network-level access controls restricting inbound traffic to the affected endpoint (/CommonSolution/GetVariableByOneIDNew). Employing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the ObjectID parameter can provide temporary protection. Additionally, monitoring logs for unusual query patterns or unexpected database errors can help detect exploitation attempts early. It is advisable to engage with the vendor for timely patch updates and to plan for an upgrade once a fix is available. As a longer-term measure, organizations should enforce secure coding practices and input validation for all parameters in web-facing applications to prevent similar vulnerabilities.

Description

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /CommonSolution/GetVariableByOneIDNew of the component Historical Data Query Module. The manipulation of the argument ObjectID leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using the Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data access or manipulation within energy management systems. Since these systems often control or monitor critical energy consumption and optimization processes, exploitation could lead to inaccurate data reporting, potential disruption of energy-saving operations, or leakage of sensitive operational data. Although the CVSS score indicates a medium severity with limited impact, attackers could leverage this vulnerability as a foothold for further network intrusion or lateral movement. This is particularly concerning for industrial facilities, smart buildings, or energy providers relying on this system. The lack of authentication requirement increases the risk of remote exploitation, potentially affecting availability and operational integrity. However, the absence of known exploits in the wild and the limited scope of the affected component somewhat mitigate immediate widespread impact.

Summary

CVE-2025-8702 is a medium-severity SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.0 of the Wanzhou WOES Intelligent Optimization Energy Saving System, specifically within the Historical Data Query Module. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization of the 'ObjectID' parameter in the /CommonSolution/GetVariableByOneIDNew endpoint. An attacker can remotely manipulate this parameter to inject malicious SQL code, potentially allowing unauthorized access to or modification of the backend database. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication, making it remotely exploitable over the network with low attack complexity. However, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is rated low, as indicated by the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/UI:N/PR:L/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). This suggests that while some data exposure or alteration is possible, the scope and severity of damage are limited. No known exploits are currently observed in the wild, and no patches have been published yet. The vulnerability disclosure date is August 7, 2025.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Aug 2025, 01:12 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats