CVE-2025-8707VulnerabilityPublished 8 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-8707: Huuge Box App · Improper Export of Android Application Components

Affects Huuge Box AppSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 13% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable system is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or through terminal emulation (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., using social engineering techniques to trick a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Huuge Box App	Affected =1.0.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-8707 effectively, European organizations should: 1) Update the Huuge Box App to a patched version once available from the vendor. 2) Restrict local access to devices by enforcing strong device security policies, including device encryption, screen locks, and restricting installation of apps from untrusted sources. 3) Implement mobile device management (MDM) solutions to control app installations and permissions, ensuring that only vetted applications are installed and that exported components are monitored. 4) Conduct regular security audits of installed applications on corporate devices to identify vulnerable versions and remove or update them promptly. 5) Educate users about the risks of installing untrusted applications and the importance of device security hygiene. 6) For developers or organizations deploying custom Android apps, review AndroidManifest.xml files to ensure that components are only exported when necessary and with proper permission enforcement. 7) Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools capable of detecting anomalous inter-app communications that may exploit exported components. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on controlling local access, application management, and proactive monitoring specific to the nature of this vulnerability.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Huuge Box App 1.0.3 on Android. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.huuge.game.zjbox. The manipulation leads to improper export of android application components. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-8707 depends largely on the usage of the Huuge Box App within their environment. If the app is used on corporate or personal devices, the vulnerability could be exploited by malicious insiders or malware with local access to the device. Potential impacts include unauthorized access to sensitive data managed by the app, manipulation of app functions, or leveraging the vulnerability as a foothold for further attacks on the device. Although the vulnerability does not allow remote exploitation, the risk remains significant in environments where device security is lax or where users may install untrusted applications. For organizations handling sensitive or regulated data, such as financial, healthcare, or governmental entities, exploitation could lead to data leakage or compromise of device integrity. Additionally, since the vulnerability affects Android devices, organizations with a large Android user base or BYOD policies should be particularly vigilant. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should not be ignored, especially in contexts where local device security cannot be guaranteed. The public disclosure of the exploit details increases the urgency for mitigation to prevent opportunistic attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…